Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.16022

Constructing Long Paths in Graph Streams

Abstract

In the graph stream model of computation, an algorithm processes the edges of an input graph in one or more sequential passes while using a memory sublinear in the input size. This model poses significant challenges for constructing long paths. Many known algorithms tasked with extending an existing path as a subroutine require an entire pass to add a single additional edge. This raises a fundamental question: Are multiple passes inherently necessary to construct paths of non-trivial lengths, or can a single pass suffice? To address this question, we study the Longest Path problem in the one-pass streaming model. In this problem, given a desired approximation factor $α$, the objective is to compute a path of length at least $\lp(G) / α$, where $\lp(G)$ is the length of a longest path in the input graph. We give algorithms as well as space lower bounds for both undirected and directed graphs. Our results include: We show that for undirected graphs, in both the insertion-only and the insertion-deletion models, there are semi-streaming algorithms, that compute a path of length at least $d /3$ with high probability, where $d$ is the average degree of the graph. These algorithms can also yield an $α$-approximation to Longest Path using space $\tilde{O}(n^2 / α)$. Next, we show that such a result cannot be achieved for directed graphs, even in the insertion-only model. We show that computing a $(n^{1 - o(1)})$-approximation to Longest Path in directed graphs in the insertion-only model requires space $Ω(n^2)$. We further show two additional lower bounds. First, we show that semi-streaming space is insufficient for small constant factor approximations to Longest Path for undirected graphs in the insertion-only model. Last, in undirected graphs in the insertion-deletion model, we show that computing an $α$-approximation requires space $Ω(n^2 / α^3)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Christian Konrad, Chhaya Trehan. 2025-08-22. Constructing Long Paths in Graph Streams. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16022

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

An efficient implementation for solving the all pairs minimax path problem in an undirected dense graph

We provide an efficient $ O(n^2) $ implementation for solving the all pairs minimax path problem or widest path problem in an undirected dense graph. It is a code implementation of the Algorithm 4 (MMJ distance by Calculation and Copy) in a previous paper. The distance matrix is also called the all points path distance (APPD). We conducted experiments to test the implementation and algorithm, compared it with several other algorithms for solving the APPD matrix. Result shows Algorithm 4 works good for solving the widest path or minimax path APPD matrix. It can drastically improve the efficiency for computing the APPD matrix. There are several theoretical outcomes which claim the APPD matrix can be solved accurately in $ O(n^2) $ . However, they are impractical because there is no code implementation of these algorithms. It seems Algorithm 4 is the first algorithm that has an actual code implementation for solving the APPD matrix of minimax path or widest path problem in $ O(n^2) $, in an undirected dense graph.

cs.DS

Approximating Partition in Deterministic Near-Linear Time

We propose a deterministic $\widetilde{O}(n + \frac{1}ε)$-time FPTAS (Fully Polynomial-Time Approximation Scheme) for the classical Partition problem. This is the best possible (up to a polylogarithmic factor) assuming SETH (Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis) [Abboud, Bringmann, Hermelin, and Shabtay'22]. Prior to our work, the best known FPTAS for Partition runs in $\widetilde{O}(n + (\frac{1}ε)^{5/4})$ time [Deng, Jin and Mao'23, Wu and Chen'22]. Our result is obtained by solving a more general problem of weakly approximating Subset Sum.

cs.DS

Dynamic Treewidth in Logarithmic Time

We present a dynamic data structure that maintains a tree decomposition of width at most $9k+8$ of a dynamic graph with treewidth at most $k$, which is updated by edge insertions and deletions. The amortized update time of our data structure is $2^{O(k)} \log n$, where $n$ is the number of vertices. The data structure also supports maintaining any ``dynamic programming scheme'' on the tree decomposition, providing, for example, a dynamic version of Courcelle's theorem with $O_{k}(\log n)$ amortized update time; the $O_{k}(\cdot)$ notation hides factors that depend on $k$. This improves upon a result of Korhonen, Majewski, Nadara, Pilipczuk, and Sokołowski [FOCS 2023], who gave a similar data structure but with amortized update time $2^{k^{O(1)}} n^{o(1)}$. Furthermore, our data structure is arguably simpler. Our main novel idea is to maintain a tree decomposition that is ``downwards well-linked'', which allows us to implement local rotations and analysis similar to those for splay trees.

cs.DS