Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.16740

Integrative Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer Survival with Gene Expression and Clinical Data

Abstract

Background: Accurate survival prediction in breast cancer is essential for patient stratification and personalized therapy. Integrating gene expression data with clinical factors may enhance prognostic performance and support precision medicine. Objective: To develop an integrative survival prediction model combining clinical variables and gene expression signatures, and to assess their contributions using penalized Cox regression and machine learning. Methods: We analyzed 1,867 patients from the METABRIC cohort with clinical annotations and microarray-based gene expression profiles. The top 5,000 most variable genes were retained. Elastic Net-penalized Cox regression identified 75 predictors (70 genes and 5 clinical variables: tumor size, stage, surgery type, age at diagnosis, and Nottingham Prognostic Index). Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and 36-month time-dependent AUC. Random Survival Forests (RSF) trained on the top 20 genes assessed nonlinear effects and validated variable importance. PCA and heatmaps visualized gene expression patterns across risk groups. Results: The integrative Cox model achieved a C-index of 0.922 and a 36-month AUC of 0.94, outperforming clinical-only models (C=0.64). RSF confirmed the prognostic value of top genes (e.g., OR2T27, TBATA, LINC01165, SLC10A4), yielding a 36-month AUC of 0.88. Conclusions: Combining gene expression signatures with clinical variables substantially improves survival prediction in breast cancer and provides a framework for individualized prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert Amevor, Emmanuel Kubuafor, Dennis Baidoo, Junaidu Salifu, Koshali Muthunama Gonnage, Onyedikachi Joshua Okeke. 2025-08-22. Integrative Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer Survival with Gene Expression and Clinical Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16740

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Triplication: an important component of the modern scientific method

A scientific-study protocol (defined) is designed to deliver results from which inductive inference is allowed. In the nineteenth century, triplication was introduced into the plant sciences and Fisher's p<0.05 rule (1925) incorporated into triple-result protocols designed to counter random/systematic errors which contribute to real-world variability. The aims of the present study were to: (1) classify replication protocols; (2) assess their prevalence in plant-science studies (published during one twenty-first-century year; for defined variable construct); (3) explore triplication rationale. Methods: a plant-sciences protocol-prevalence report was produced; experimental/associational-study proportions analyzed; and real-world-data proxies used to show confidence-interval-width patterns with increasing replicate number. Results: 25% plant-science studies analyzed showed triplication, including 11% triple-result protocols (including greater replicate numbers: 48%;17%, respectively). Theoretical considerations indicated that even if systematic errors predominate, (previously-known) square-root rules sometimes apply, contributing to triplication importance (exemplified by real-world-data proxies). Conclusions: The defined protocols, with minor modifications, should provide the means for assessment of most sciences. Triplication was extensively applied in studies analysed and there are strong methodological reasons why triplication, rather than duplication/quadruplication, is the appropriate standard: triple-result protocols: (a) effectively reduce false positives to acceptable levels; (b) give qualitatively-different information (shape) from duplication; (c) have a large efficiency advantage (concerning confidence-interval widths) over quadruplication. The application of batch replication is not, primarily, a statistical problem and cannot effectively be replaced by simulation.

q-bio.QM

Retracing the Process of Translation: Proteome-wide mapping of stable transcriptomic predictors of protein abundance in cancer cell lines

Understanding the relationship between gene expression and protein abundance is central to molecular and systems biology. While gene expression reflects transcriptional activity, proteins are the functional molecules that determine cellular phenotypes. However, numerous post-transcriptional and translational regulatory layers complicate this relationship, and prior studies have reported only weak to moderate correlations between RNA and protein levels. Predicting protein abundance from transcriptomic data remains challenging, but it is a valuable goal for biological insight, especially when proteomic data is limited or unavailable. In this study, we applied a large-scale, Ridge regression-based feature selection strategy to identify predictive gene expression features for each of 8,423 proteins across 940 cancer cell lines. To our knowledge, this is the first work to perform such comprehensive protein-wise feature selection at this scale. Our analysis revealed both globally predictive and context-specific gene features. These included biologically meaningful modules such as immune-related genes, HOX transcription factor targets, and cytoskeletal components. The models identified stable candidate gene-protein associations that remained interpretable at the level of individual proteins and recurrent transcriptomic predictor patterns. Our approach enables interpretable modeling of protein expression from transcriptomic data and provides insight into transcriptomic features associated with protein abundance. This framework may support hypothesis generation, protein imputation in incomplete datasets, and deeper understanding of post-transcriptional regulation in cancer biology.

q-bio.QM

Surf_2_Volume: a workflow for converting CIFTI parcellations to NIfTI volume space

Many neuroimaging programs require volumetric NIfTI files and cannot directly use parcellations stored in CIFTI format. We developed Surf_2_Volume, a workflow that uses Connectome Workbench, FreeSurfer, AFNI/SUMA, neuromaps, and Python to convert categorical CIFTI parcellations into NIfTI volumes. Cortical labels are transferred through fsaverage to a surface representation of the MNI152 template and assigned to voxels within a smoothed cortical ribbon mask. A threshold controls how much of this mask is included. We tested twelve thresholds with the Schaefer2018 atlas with 100 parcels and 7 networks, which is available as both an fsLR representation and a published FSL MNI152 1 mm volume. We compared each converted volume with the published reference and with standard Workbench ribbon and nearest-vertex mappings. At threshold 0.05, Surf_2_Volume had higher scores on the two measures of parcel overlap, Dice and Jaccard, than the best Workbench setting (0.729 vs. 0.709 and 0.580 vs. 0.556, respectively). It also left fewer reference voxels unlabeled (11.88% vs. 20.57%) and assigned fewer labels outside the reference (9.43% vs. 11.22%). Among the tested Surf_2_Volume thresholds, 0.05 also produced the lowest average parcel volume distortion. Surf_2_Volume provides a tunable and reproducible workflow for generating volumetric atlases from CIFTI parcellations when volume-based analyses are required.

q-bio.QM