Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.21189

Faster Linear Algebra Algorithms with Structured Random Matrices

Abstract

To achieve the greatest possible speed, practitioners regularly implement randomized algorithms for low-rank approximation and least-squares regression with structured dimension reduction maps. Despite significant research effort, basic questions remain about the design and analysis of randomized linear algebra algorithms that employ structured random matrices. This paper develops a new perspective on structured dimension reduction, based on the oblivious subspace injection (OSI) property. The OSI property is a relatively weak assumption on a random matrix that holds when the matrix preserves the length of vectors on average and, with high probability, does not annihilate any vector in a low-dimensional subspace. With the OSI abstraction, the analysis of a randomized linear algebra algorithm factors into two parts: (i) proving that the algorithm works when implemented with an OSI; and (ii) proving that a given random matrix model has the OSI property. This paper develops both parts of the program. First, it analyzes standard randomized algorithms for low-rank approximation and least-squares regression under the OSI assumption. Second, it identifies many examples of OSIs, including random sparse matrices, randomized trigonometric transforms, and random matrices with tensor product structure. These theoretical results imply faster, near-optimal runtimes for several fundamental linear algebra tasks. The paper also provides guidance on implementation, along with empirical evidence that structured random matrices offer exemplary performance for a range of synthetic problems and contemporary scientific applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Chris Camaño, Ethan N. Epperly, Raphael A. Meyer, Joel A. Tropp. 2025-08-28. Faster Linear Algebra Algorithms with Structured Random Matrices. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21189

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS