Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.21625

Evaluating Ethnic Income Gap in China: The Case of Han, Mongol, and Manchu in Liaoning and Inner Mongolia

Abstract

This study analyzes the 2018 Chinese Household Income Project survey data to evaluate the income gaps between an "outsider" ethnic minority group, the Mongols, an "insider" ethnic minority group, the Manchus, and the majority Han group in urban and rural areas of Liaoning province and Inner Mongolia in China. Three statistical methods, a simple first-order OLS linear regression, linear regressions with interaction terms, and the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition, are used to investigate the income disparity amongst the three groups. The results indicate that Mongols suffer a significant ethnic wage penalty attributable to possible discrimination in the rural areas of these two provinces, while the urban income gaps between the three groups can mostly be explained by participation in public sector occupations or affiliation with the Chinese Communist Party. In rural settings, Mongols also have higher returns to public sector jobs and CCP membership compared to the other two ethnic groups. The findings suggest that Chinese affirmative actions regarding ethnic policy are effective in accelerating the integration of ethnic minorities with Han in the outcomes of the labor market. This conclusion is consistent with previous studies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinyan Deng. 2025-08-29. Evaluating Ethnic Income Gap in China: The Case of Han, Mongol, and Manchu in Liaoning and Inner Mongolia. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21625

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN

Productivity Shocks and Input Misallocation: A Decomposition

This paper asks how much input misallocation productivity uncertainty generates and at which stage of input decisions it arises. I separate revenue productivity by when each component is revealed and trace each into the gap between an input's marginal revenue product and its price. In six European countries, shocks revealed after an input is committed account for 20 percent of capital gap dispersion and 5 percent of labor gap dispersion. An unanticipated one percent rise in productivity raises the capital gap by 0.92 percent and the labor gap by 0.19 percent, because most of the shock passes into the wage.

econ.GN

When Do Type-Specific Wages Buffer Distributional Incidence in TANK?

When do relative wages buffer the unequal incidence of aggregate shocks? I derive a consumption-gap decomposition and a present-value condition for partial offset in a TANK model. An extension separates wage-setting demand elasticity from substitution between labor segments and allows each segment to contain both financial types. With a zero inherited wage gap and a same-sign discounted wedge, substitution above one gives offsetting earnings reallocation; substitution below one gives amplification. The channel disappears when financial types have identical segment exposure. Numerical experiments assess these mechanisms, shock persistence, policy feedback, and aggregate-IRF matching. In the nested perfect-alignment monetary benchmark, the peak consumption gap is about two-fifths smaller under type-specific wages than under the common-wage closure. These are conditional model comparisons, not empirical effect estimates or welfare rankings.

econ.GN