Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.02280

On lower bounds for the distances between APN functions

Abstract

Whether two distinct APN functions can have a Hamming distance of $1$ remains an open problem. In 2020, L. Budaghyan et al. introduced a new CCZ-invariant $Π_F$ which can be used to provide lower bounds on the Hamming distance between a given APN function $F \colon \mathbb{F}_2^n \to \mathbb{F}_2^n$ and other APN functions. Lower bounds on the distance from an APN function $F$ to any other APN function $G$ are known when $F$ is an almost bent (AB) function or when $F$ is a $3$-to-$1$ quadratic function with $n$ even. In this paper, we reinterpret $Π_F$ in terms of the multiplicities of the 3-sums of the graph $\mathcal{G}_F=\{(x, F(x)) : x \in \mathbb{F}_2^n\}$ of $F$ as a Sidon set, which we call exclude multiplicities. For even $n$, we establish lower bounds on the distance between $F$ and any other APN function $G$ when $F$ is plateaued APN, and we generalize a previously known lower bound for quadratic $3$-to-$1$ functions to the case where $F$ is plateaued $3$-to-$1$ (e.g., when $F$ is a Kasami function). For odd $n$, we derive new lower bounds when $F$ is the APN inverse function over $\mathbb{F}_{2^n}$. We also study how the exclude multiplicities of $\mathcal{G}_F$ are directly connected to the existence of linear structures of $γ_F$ when $F$ is plateaued APN and to the ortho-derivative when $F$ is a quadratic APN function. In particular, we prove that $γ_F$ has no nontrivial linear structures when $F$ is plateaued APN. We also use the CCZ-invariance of exclude multiplicities to prove that the Brinkmann-Leander-Edel-Pott function is not CCZ-equivalent to a plateaued function.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Mihaila, Darrion Thornburgh. 2026-06-06. On lower bounds for the distances between APN functions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12095-026-00908-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO