Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.04939

The SChISM study: Cell-free DNA size profiles as predictors of progression in advanced carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors

Abstract

Background: Many advanced cancer patients experience progression under immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) size profiles offer a promising noninvasive multi-cancer approach to monitor and predict immunotherapy response. Methods: In the SChISM (Size CfDNA Immunotherapy Signature Monitoring) study (NCT05083494), pre-treatment plasmatic cfDNA size profiles from 126 ICI-treated advanced carcinomas were quantified using the BIABooster device. Fragmentomederived variables (concentration, peaks' position, and fragment size ranges) at baseline were analyzed for associations with early progression (EP, progression at first imaging) and progression-free survival (PFS), using logistic and Cox regression models. Bootstrap analysis validated robustness. Additional analyses were performed in homogeneous subpopulations: first-line lung cancer patients (n = 60) and head-andneck patients treated with Nivolumab (n = 25). Results: Higher cfDNA concentration and high quantities of short fragments (111-240 base pairs (bp)) were associated with poor response, unlike long fragments (> 300 bp). The proportion of fragments longer than 1650 bp demonstrated highest discriminatory power (AUC = 0.73, C-index = 0.69). It was significantly associated with non-EP (odds ratio = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.25-0.62]) and longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.42-0.68]). These associations remained significant when adjusted for confounders (age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor type, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) and across both subpopulations. Bootstrap analysis confirmed robustness with mean accuracy of 70.1 $\pm$ 4.17% and positive predictive value of 55.6 $\pm$ 7.37%, in test sets. Conclusion: cfDNA size profiles significantly predicted ICI response and anticipate relapse, outperforming the routinely used marker programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and reflecting enhanced immune system activation. Trial registration: (NCT05083494), date of registration: 2021-10-19.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Linh Nguyen Phuong, Frederic Fina, Laurent Greillier, Pascale Tomasini, Jean-Laurent Deville, Romain Zakrasjek, Lucie Della-Negra, Audrey Boutonnet, Frédéric Ginot, Jean-Charles Garcia, Sébastien Benzekry, Sébastien Salas. 2025-09-05. The SChISM study: Cell-free DNA size profiles as predictors of progression in advanced carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04939

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Lightning-fast adaptive immune receptor similarity search by symmetric deletion lookup

An individual's adaptive immune receptor (AIR) repertoire records immune history due to the receptors' antigen specificity. Reading this record requires computational approaches for inferring receptor function from sequence, as the diversity of possible receptor-antigen pairs vastly outstrips experimental knowledge. Identification of AIRs with similar sequence and thus putatively similar function is a common performance bottleneck in these approaches. Here, we benchmark the runtime scaling of five algorithmic approaches to radius-based search for Levenshtein neighbors. We show that a symmetric deletion lookup approach, originally proposed for spell-checking, is particularly scalable. We introduce SymScan and XTNeighbor, optimized CPU and GPU software implementing a parallelized variant of the algorithm. For one million input sequences, these tools identify all sequence pairs that differ by one or two edits in seconds, orders of magnitude faster than existing approaches. We demonstrate how symmetric deletion lookup can be integrated as a pre-filtering step in T cell receptor metaclone discovery and B cell receptor lineage identification. Our contribution is poised to greatly accelerate existing analysis pipelines and enable processing of immunosequencing data at scale.

q-bio.QM

Implication of modelling choices on connectivity estimation: A comparative analysis

Landscape connectivity is an important field with important conservation implications. Connectivity modelling is a useful tool to inform and guide landscape planning. However, it involves assumptions and methodological decisions which ultimately impact connectivity outcomes. In order to understand the implications of modelling choices on final connectivity estimations, we compare two landscape characterisation approaches - expert knowledge and species distribution models - and three movements models - least-cost paths, circuit theory and an individual-based movement simulator. The implementation of the models and the construction of the analyses scope highlighted conceptual and methodological differences that made the comparison difficult. Landscape characterisation appears as the principal factor determining connectivity outcomes. Therefore, the confrontation between expert knowledge and species distribution models is critical to leverage points of convergence and complementarity between these two approaches. Conceptual differences between movement models are reported on connectivity map and habitat patch contribution estimations. In the want of data and protocol design specifically to validate connectivity models, approaches that integrate stochastic and behavioural processes, bring a more realistic perspective to connectivity estimation.

q-bio.QM

Triplication: an important component of the modern scientific method

A scientific-study protocol (defined) is designed to deliver results from which inductive inference is allowed. In the nineteenth century, triplication was introduced into the plant sciences and Fisher's p<0.05 rule (1925) incorporated into triple-result protocols designed to counter random/systematic errors which contribute to real-world variability. The aims of the present study were to: (1) classify replication protocols; (2) assess their prevalence in plant-science studies (published during one twenty-first-century year; for defined variable construct); (3) explore triplication rationale. Methods: a plant-sciences protocol-prevalence report was produced; experimental/associational-study proportions analyzed; and real-world-data proxies used to show confidence-interval-width patterns with increasing replicate number. Results: 25% plant-science studies analyzed showed triplication, including 11% triple-result protocols (including greater replicate numbers: 48%;17%, respectively). Theoretical considerations indicated that even if systematic errors predominate, (previously-known) square-root rules sometimes apply, contributing to triplication importance (exemplified by real-world-data proxies). Conclusions: The defined protocols, with minor modifications, should provide the means for assessment of most sciences. Triplication was extensively applied in studies analysed and there are strong methodological reasons why triplication, rather than duplication/quadruplication, is the appropriate standard: triple-result protocols: (a) effectively reduce false positives to acceptable levels; (b) give qualitatively-different information (shape) from duplication; (c) have a large efficiency advantage (concerning confidence-interval widths) over quadruplication. The application of batch replication is not, primarily, a statistical problem and cannot effectively be replaced by simulation.

q-bio.QM