Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.05814

A graph energy conjecture through the lenses of semidefinite programming

Abstract

Let $G$ be a graph on $n$ vertices with independence number $α(G)$. Let $\mathcal{E}(G)$ be the energy of a graph, defined as the sum of the absolute values of the adjacency eigenvalues of $G$. Using Graffiti, Fajtlowicz conjectured in the 1980s that $$\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{E}(G) \geq n - α(G).$$ In this paper we derive a semidefinite program formulation of the graph energy, and we use it to obtain several results that constitute a first step towards proving this conjecture. In particular, we show that $$\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{E}(G) \geq n - χ_f(\overline{G}) \quad \text{ and } \quad \frac{1}{2}\mathcal{E}(G) \geq n - H(G),$$ where $χ_f(G)$ is the fractional chromatic number and $H(G)$ is Hoffman's ratio number. As a byproduct of the SDP formulation we obtain several lower bounds for the graph energy that improve and refine previous results by Hoffman (1970) and Nikiforov (2007). The later author showed that the conjecture holds for almost all graphs. However, the graph families known to attain the conjecture with equality are highly structured and do not represent typical graphs. Motivated by this, we prove the following bound in support of the conjecture for the class of highly regular graphs $$\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{E}(G) \geq n - \vartheta^-(G),$$ where $\vartheta^-$ is Schrijver's theta number.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aida Abiad, Gabriel Coutinho, Emanuel Juliano, Luuk Reijnders. 2025-09-06. A graph energy conjecture through the lenses of semidefinite programming. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05814

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO