Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.09212

MAPSS: Manifold-based Assessment of Perceptual Source Separation

Abstract

Objective assessment of audio source-separation systems still mismatches subjective human perception, especially when interference from competing talkers and distortion of the target signal interact. We introduce Perceptual Separation (PS) and Perceptual Match (PM), a complementary pair of measures that, by design, isolate these leakage and distortion factors. Our intrusive approach generates a set of fundamental distortions, e.g., clipping, notch filter, and pitch shift from each reference waveform signal in the mixture. Distortions, references, and system outputs from all sources are independently encoded by a pre-trained self-supervised model, then aggregated and embedded with a manifold learning technique called diffusion maps, which aligns Euclidean distances on the manifold with dissimilarities of the encoded waveform representations. On this manifold, PM captures the self-distortion of a source by measuring distances from its output to its reference and associated distortions, while PS captures leakage by also accounting for distances from the output to non-attributed references and distortions. Both measures are differentiable and operate at a resolution as high as 75 frames per second, allowing granular optimization and analysis. We further derive, for both measures, frame-level deterministic error radius and non-asymptotic, high-probability confidence intervals. Experiments on English, Spanish, and music mixtures show that, against 18 widely used measures, the PS and PM are almost always placed first or second in linear and rank correlations with subjective human mean-opinion scores.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amir Ivry, Samuele Cornell, Shinji Watanabe. 2026-02-27. MAPSS: Manifold-based Assessment of Perceptual Source Separation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discovery

Building a lexicon from discovered word-like units is a central goal in zero-resource speech processing. But do our evaluations provide a trustworthy indication of lexicon quality? A common metric, normalized edit distance, averages the phoneme edit distances between discovered units in each cluster. We show that this metric has an inherent bias toward the quality of large clusters, inhibiting fair evaluation. Moreover, it ignores how well true classes are distributed across clusters. Based on established theory in clustering literature, we propose two metrics that address these shortcomings: a modified metric that weighs cluster size when assessing within-cluster consistency, and an inverse metric that assesses how true words are spread across clusters. Through experiments on synthetic and real-world lexicons, we demonstrate that combined, these metrics are: (1) more closely correlated with how similar a lexicon is to the ground-truth distribution, and (2) more robust to biases that skew lexicon evaluations.

eess.AS

AURA: Uncertainty-Routed Activation Editing for Acoustic Grounding in Speech Foundation Models

Attention encoder-decoder (AED) Speech Foundation Models achieve strong ASR performance but can generate acoustically unsupported text when inputs contain no speech, weak acoustic evidence, or unreliable transcription. We propose AURA: Activation-editing with Uncertainty-Routed Adaptation, an ultra-efficient representation-editing method that freezes the pretrained model and applies sparse scale-and-shift edits to decoder cross-attention heads. AURA dynamically routes edits using cross-attention uncertainty features that capture over-concentration, diffuse attention, and abrupt frame shifts. We evaluate AURA on four datasets spanning non-speech hallucination and speech grounding stressors, including imperfect-label child speech, imperfect-label adult speech, and disfluent speech. On non-speech audio, AURA reduces hallucination rate from 89.18% to 1.94% without prior hallucination-head identification. On imperfect-label corpora, AURA approaches LoRA WER while using roughly 500x fewer trainable parameters. Sensitivity analysis and qualitative cross-attention examples are consistent with AURA's uncertainty-routed editing behavior, supporting dynamic activation editing as a practical path for grounding AED speech models.

eess.AS

The design of an optomechanical microphone using a photonic waveguide interferometer

We present an optomechanical microphone based on a diaphragm-integrated photonic waveguide Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Acoustic pressure deforms the MEMS diaphragm, inducing strain in the sensing waveguide and changing its optical path length. We analytically evaluate the optical and mechanical transduction mechanisms and key figures of merit, including signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, acoustic overload pressure, and minimum detectable pressure. Two design cases are considered: a MEMS microphone and a measurement microphone. The results indicate competitive performance but no substantial overall advantage over state-of-the-art microphones in conventional applications. The architecture may nevertheless offer advantages for high-temperature and other harsh-environment sensing applications.

eess.AS