Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.09553

Parity of the partition function in quadratic progressions

Abstract

The parity of the partition function $p(n)$ is one of the most stubborn problems in number theory. In 2010, the first author conjectured, for square-free $1<D\equiv 23\pmod{24}$, that the values $p\!\left(\frac{Dm^2+1}{24}\right)$, as $m$ ranges over positive integers with $(m,6)=1$, include infinitely many even and infinitely many odd terms. We prove this conjecture. The key new idea is geometric. Logarithmic derivatives of twisted Borcherds products built from Ramanujan's third-order mock theta functions recast the problem in terms of CM points of discriminant $-D$ on $X_0(6)$. The uniqueness of canonical lifts from characteristic $2$ to characteristic zero shows that the CM points supporting the poles remain distinct after reduction modulo $2$. This fact, combined with an Eisenstein series comparison and a Galois representation argument, rules out constant parity and gives infinitely many values of each parity. The method applies to the coefficients of analogous generalized twisted Borcherds products. These results imply that \[\#\{0\leq n\leq X: p(n)\text{ is odd}\}\gg\sqrt X,\] which is now the best known lower bound for odd values of $p(n)$. The algebraic identities at the heart of this paper, as well as the improved lower bound for odd partition numbers, have been formalized in Lean by AxiomProver.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ken Ono, Ashvin Swaminathan. 2026-09-01. Parity of the partition function in quadratic progressions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09553

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Transcendence Meets Normality: Construction of Transcendentally Normal Numbers

In this work, we study real numbers $x$ for which $p(x)$ is (absolutely) normal for every non-constant integer-valued polynomial $p$. We call such numbers transcendentally normal. We prove that almost every real number is transcendentally normal and provide an explicit construction of such a number, based on Sierpinski's covering method and novel ideas involving the so-called stretch function. In the next step, we transform this construction into an algorithm that computes the digits of a t-normal number recursively in all integer bases. Moreover, we extend our covering approach to construct and compute LIL-normal numbers whose discrepancies are of the order predicted by the law of the iterated logarithm. We also take the opportunity to discuss several interesting open problems.

math.NT