Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.12551

Who Uses Whose Telescopes? Analyzing the Knowledge Geography and Research Dominance of Global Astronomical Facilities

Yue Chen·Yuqi Wang·Yuying Gao·Zhiqi Wang·Lianlian Liu·Chun Yang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large-scale research infrastructures (LSRIs) are central to contemporary science policy, combining massive capital investments with international access regimes. Yet whether open access to these infrastructures translates into more equitable scientific authority remains contested. Astronomy provides a critical case: world-leading observatories are globally shared but embedded in specific national contexts. We compile a novel country--year dataset (1955--2025) linking the location of astronomical facilities with publication usage and authorship roles. This enables us to distinguish between hosting, using, and leading in telescope-based research. Our analysis reveals: (i) usage and impact are heavily concentrated in a small number of facility hubs; (ii) scientific leadership is even more unequal than access or usage (Gini coefficient 0.91 for first/corresponding authorship versus 0.85 for facilities and usage); (iii) hosting and leadership often decouple--countries such as Chile and South Africa mediate large publication volumes without commensurate gains in leading roles; and (iv) global leadership has shifted from U.S. dominance to a multi-hub system centered in the United States, Western Europe, China, Japan, and Australia. These findings challenge the assumption that international access alone democratizes science. We argue that converting participation into leadership requires domestic PI programs, investments in instrumentation and data pipelines, and governance models that distribute credit more equitably. The study highlights how the governance of LSRIs shapes global scientific hierarchies and offers design principles for infrastructures that seek not only to share data but also to broaden scientific authority.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yue Chen, Yuqi Wang, Yuying Gao, Zhiqi Wang, Lianlian Liu, Chun Yang. 2025-09-18. Who Uses Whose Telescopes? Analyzing the Knowledge Geography and Research Dominance of Global Astronomical Facilities. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.12551

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Radial Pulsations in Polaris: A Secondary Science Application of Cherenkov Telescopes via Intensity Interferometry

Ground-based Cherenkov telescopes, which are typically inoperative during moonlit nights for gamma-ray observations, offer a valuable opportunity during this time for secondary scientific applications through Intensity Interferometry (II). Recent developments and observations suggest that implementing II instrumentation on existing and planned Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs) can significantly advance optical stellar measurements. Motivated by the resurgence of II efforts over the past two decades, this work presents simulations demonstrating the estimation of stellar parameters for a radially pulsating star, such as Polaris, using either a single telescope or multiple telescopes. For single-telescope simulations, we assume that the photon pixels in the camera are mapped onto four distinct regions of the aperture, generating multiple baselines and enabling enhanced observational plane coverage. These results highlight the potential of Cherenkov telescopes in India for high-resolution optical astronomy during otherwise inoperative periods and offer promising insights into the characterization of bright stellar objects with unprecedented precision.

astro-ph.IM↗
arXiv2026

Parallel adaptive reweighting importance sampling for Bayesian astrophysics

Efficient sampling from high-dimensional, multi-modal posteriors is a central challenge in Bayesian inference across the physical sciences. Gravitational-wave (GW) astronomy, where likelihood evaluations are computationally expensive and posteriors are complex, is one application motivating this work. Popular families of methods like Markov-chain Monte Carlo, nested sampling, and importance sampling all rely on proposal distributions to guide exploration. Because prior knowledge of the target is often limited, practitioners can adopt adaptive proposals that iteratively refine themselves using information gained from previously drawn samples. Traditional adaptive strategies, however, struggle in high-dimensional multi-modal settings: complex, non-linear correlations are hard to capture, and hyperparameters typically require tedious, problem-specific tuning. To address these issues, we introduce Parallel Adaptive Reweighting Importance Sampling (PARIS; descriptively, ``seed sampling''). PARIS models its proposal as a Gaussian mixture whose component centers are the existing samples and whose component weights match the current importance weights. New draws from the proposal therefore concentrate around high-weight regions, while candidate points in unexplored areas receive intentionally inflated weights. As the algorithm continuously reweights all samples up to the latest proposal, any initial over-weighting self-corrects once additional neighbor samples are collected. To enable rapid reweighting, we present an efficient update scheme and evaluate PARIS on illustrative toy problems and more realistic gravitational-wave parameter estimation tasks. PARIS achieves accurate posterior reconstruction and evidence estimation with substantially fewer function evaluations than competing approaches, highlighting its promise for widespread use in astrophysical data analysis.

astro-ph.IM↗
arXiv2026

Ising noise filter: physics-informed filtering for particle detectors

We present the Ising noise filter, a highly portable, graph-based pre-filtering algorithm for early-stage background suppression in particle accelerators and astrophysical detectors. Standard noise rejection methods relying on track fitting suffer from severe combinatorial explosion. Our method bypasses this by mapping individual detector hits to a network of binary spins and minimizing an energy functional. The interaction kernels are physics-informed, tailored to the underlying physics and geometry of the experiment. We demonstrate the efficacy of this approach in two distinct experimental regimes. Applied to the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope the filter yields fast, standard-quality noise rejection with 96.8% recall for astrophysical neutrinos. For the SPD detector at the NICA collider the filter attains recall of 97% on a toy Monte Carlo sample. Furthermore, when combined with a Peterson--Hopfield network for track finding, our physics-informed coupling improves the TrackML score from 0.5 to 0.95.

astro-ph.IM↗