Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.20983

Goldman-Turaev formality from the Kontsevich integral

Abstract

We present a new solution to the formality problem for the framed Goldman--Turaev Lie bialgebra, constructing Goldman-Turaev homomorphic expansions (formality isomorphisms) from the Kontsevich integral. Our proof uses a three dimensional derivation of the Goldman-Turaev Lie biaglebra arising from a low-degree Vassiliev quotient -- the {\em emergent} quotient -- of tangles in a thickened punctured disk, modulo a Conway skein relation. This is in contrast to Massuyeau's 2018 proof using braids. A feature of our approach is a general conceptual framework which is applied to prove the compatibility of the homomorphic expansion with both the Goldman bracket and the technically challenging Turaev cobracket.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dror Bar-Natan, Zsuzsanna Dancso, Tamara Hogan, Jessica Liu, Nancy Scherich. 2026-08-19. Goldman-Turaev formality from the Kontsevich integral. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20983

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Categorification of quasi-split iquantum groups

We introduce a new family of graded 2-categories generalizing the 2-quantum groups introduced by Khovanov, Lauda and Rouquier. We use them to categorify quasi-split iquantum groups in all symmetric types.

math.QA

The Ring of Differential Operators on a Nodal Curve is not a Bialgebroid

In a previous article, we showed that local projectivity is a sufficient condition for the existence of a bialgebroid structure on the ring of differential operators on an affine variety. In this note, we show using elementary methods that the ring of differential operators on a nodal curve is neither locally projective nor does it admit a bialgebroid structure.

math.QA

Coset representatives corresponding to Yetter-Drinfeld modules of modular group and continued fraction

We give complete conjugacy classes of modular group SL(2,Z). Particularly, the conjugacy classes of hyperbolic elements are decided by the proper equivalence classes of indefinite forms, and we give an example. Finally, we describe the coset representatives of centralizer of S, ST, T and hyperbolic elements of SL(2,Z) by regular continued fraction. In conclusion, most Nichols algebras over modular group are infinite-dimensional except Proposition 4.10.

math.QA