Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2509.22849

Parameterized Hardness of Zonotope Containment and Neural Network Verification

Abstract

Neural networks with ReLU activations are a widely used model in machine learning. It is thus important to have a profound understanding of the properties of the functions computed by such networks. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the (parameterized) computational complexity of determining these properties. In this work, we close several gaps and resolve an open problem posed by Froese et al. [COLT '25] regarding the parameterized complexity of various problems related to network verification. In particular, we prove that, for all $\ell\ge 2$, deciding positivity (and thus surjectivity) of a function $f:\mathbb{R}^d\to\mathbb{R}$ computed by an $\ell$-layer ReLU network is W[$\ell-1$]-hard when parameterized by the input dimension $d$. The case $\ell=2$ implies that zonotope non-containment (a problem that is of independent interest in computational geometry, control theory, and robotics) is W[1]-hard with respect to the ambient dimension $d$. Moreover, we show that approximating the maximum within any multiplicative factor and computing the $L_p$-Lipschitz constant for $p\in(0,\infty]$ in $\ell$-layer networks is NP-hard and W[$\ell-1$]-hard with respect to $d$. For $\ell\ge 3$, approximating the $L_p$-Lipschitz constant is NP- and W[$\ell-2$]-hard. We further show that the above problems are NP- and W[$t$]-hard (for all $t\ge 1$) with respect to $\ell$ for constant $d$. Notably, our hardness results imply that the naive enumeration-based methods for these fundamental problems running in $n^{(\ell-1) d}\cdot\operatorname{poly}(N)$ time are all essentially optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Vincent Froese, Moritz Grillo, Christoph Hertrich, Moritz Stargalla. 2026-09-03. Parameterized Hardness of Zonotope Containment and Neural Network Verification. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

It's Hard to PArcK

We show that Partizan Arc Kayles (PArcK), a generalization of Domineering to graphs, is PSPACE-complete via a reduction from Positive CNF and with recently-discovered techniques for creating PArcK positions with high temperature. The reduction uses only red and blue edges.

cs.CC

Improved Subexponential Upper Bounds for $3$-Restricted Matching Vector Families

Matching Vector families (MVFs) are defined by two ordered lists of vectors in $\mathbb{Z}_m^n$ whose inner products satisfy specific residue patterns modulo an integer $m$. Most famously, restricted MVFs are used to construct the best-known constant-query Locally Decodable codes (LDCs). We prove an upper bound of $2^{O\left(\sqrt{n\log n \log m}\right)}$ on the size of $3$-restricted MVFs in $\mathbb{Z}_m^n$ for $m \leq \sqrt{n}$, substantially improving on the previous best bound of $2^{O(n/\log n)}$ by Bhowmick, Dvir and Lovett (STOC'13, SICOMP'14). Our proof relies on a new polynomial method argument that controls collisions in sumsets of matching vectors.

cs.CC

Equality cases of the Stanley--Yan log-concave matroid inequality

The \emph{Stanley--Yan} (SY) \emph{inequality} gives the ultra-log-concavity for the numbers of bases of a matroid which have given sizes of intersections with $k$ fixed disjoint sets. The inequality was proved by Stanley (1981) for regular matroids, and by Yan (2023) in full generality. In the original paper, Stanley asked for equality conditions of the SY~inequality, and proved total equality conditions for regular matroids in the case $k=0$. In this paper, we completely resolve Stanley's problem. First, we obtain an explicit description of the equality cases of the SY inequality for $k=0$, extending Stanley's results to general matroids and removing the ``total equality'' assumption. Second, for $k\ge 1$, we prove that the equality cases of the SY inequality cannot be described in a sense that they are not in the polynomial hierarchy unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to a finite level.

math.CO