Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.01542

Equity Market Price Changes Are Predictable: A Natural Science Approach

Abstract

Equity markets have long been regarded as unpredictable, with intraday price movements treated as stochastic noise. This study challenges that view by introducing the Extended Samuelson Model (ESM), a natural science-based framework that captures the dynamic, causal processes underlying market behavior. ESM identifies peaks, troughs, and turning points across multiple timescales and demonstrates temporal compatibility: finer timeframes contain all signals of broader ones while offering sharper directional guidance. Beyond theory, ESM translates into practical trading strategies. During intraday sessions, it reliably anticipates short-term reversals and longer-term trends, even under the influence of breaking news. Its eight market states and six directional signals provide actionable guardrails for traders, enabling consistent profit opportunities. Notably, even during calm periods, ESM can capture 10-point swings in the S&P 500, equivalent to $500 per E-mini futures contract. These findings resonate with the state-based approaches attributed to Renaissance Technologies' Medallion Fund, which delivered extraordinary returns through systematic intraday trading. By bridging normal conditions with crisis dynamics, ESM not only advances the scientific understanding of market evolution but also provides a robust, actionable roadmap for profitable trading.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Qingyuan Han. 2025-10-02. Equity Market Price Changes Are Predictable: A Natural Science Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01542

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN

Productivity Shocks and Input Misallocation: A Decomposition

This paper asks how much input misallocation productivity uncertainty generates and at which stage of input decisions it arises. I separate revenue productivity by when each component is revealed and trace each into the gap between an input's marginal revenue product and its price. In six European countries, shocks revealed after an input is committed account for 20 percent of capital gap dispersion and 5 percent of labor gap dispersion. An unanticipated one percent rise in productivity raises the capital gap by 0.92 percent and the labor gap by 0.19 percent, because most of the shock passes into the wage.

econ.GN

When Do Type-Specific Wages Buffer Distributional Incidence in TANK?

When do relative wages buffer the unequal incidence of aggregate shocks? I derive a consumption-gap decomposition and a present-value condition for partial offset in a TANK model. An extension separates wage-setting demand elasticity from substitution between labor segments and allows each segment to contain both financial types. With a zero inherited wage gap and a same-sign discounted wedge, substitution above one gives offsetting earnings reallocation; substitution below one gives amplification. The channel disappears when financial types have identical segment exposure. Numerical experiments assess these mechanisms, shock persistence, policy feedback, and aggregate-IRF matching. In the nested perfect-alignment monetary benchmark, the peak consumption gap is about two-fifths smaller under type-specific wages than under the common-wage closure. These are conditional model comparisons, not empirical effect estimates or welfare rankings.

econ.GN