Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.01701

Positive Univariate Polynomials: SOS certificates, algorithms, bit complexity, and T-systems

Abstract

We consider certificates of positivity for univariate polynomials with rational coefficients that are positive over (an interval of)~$\mathbb{R}$. Such certificates take the form of weighted sums of squares (SOS) of polynomials with rational coefficients. We build on the algorithm of Chevillard, Harrison, Jolde{ş}, and Lauter~\cite{chml-usos-alg-11}, and we introduce a variant that we refer to as \usos. Given a polynomial of degree~$d$ with maximum coefficient bitsize~$τ$, we show that \usos computes a rational weighted SOS representation in $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}_B(d^3 + d^2 τ)$ bit operations; the resulting certificate of posivitity involves rationals of bitsize $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(d^2 τ)$. This improves the best-known complexity bounds by a factor of~$d$ and completes previous analyses. We also extend these results to certificates of positivity over arbitrary rational intervals, via a simple transformation. In this case as well, our techniques yield a factor-$d$ improvement in the complexity bounds. Along the same line, for univariate polynomials with rational coefficients, we introduce a new class of certificates, which we call \emph{perturbed SOS certificates}. They consist of a sum of two rational squares that approximates the input polynomial closely enough so that nonnegativity of the approximation implies the nonnegativity of the original polynomial. This computation has the same bit complexity and yields certificates of the same bitsize as in the weighted SOS case. We further investigate structural properties of these SOS decompositions. Relying on the classical result that any nonnegative univariate real polynomial is the sum of two squares of real polynomials, we show that the summands form an interlacing pair. Consequently, their real roots correspond to the Karlin points of the original polynomial on~$\mathbb{R}$, establishing a new connection with the T-systems studied by Karlin~\cite{Karlin-repr-pos-63}. This connection enables us to compute such decompositions explicitly. Previously, only existential results were known for T-systems. We obtain analogous results for positivity over $(0, \infty)$, and hence over arbitrary real intervals. Finally, we present our open-source Maple implementation of the \usos algorithm, together with experiments on various data sets demonstrating the efficiency of our approach.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matías Bender, Philipp Di Dio, Elias Tsigaridas. 2025-12-29. Positive Univariate Polynomials: SOS certificates, algorithms, bit complexity, and T-systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01701

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

CVP Is NP-Complete for Principal Cyclotomic Ideals

We prove that exact Euclidean decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on the coefficient lattices of nonzero principal ideals in the power-of-two cyclotomic rings $R_d:=\mathbb{Z}[y]/(y^d+1)$. Our deterministic reduction from Exact Cover by 3-Sets (X3C) produces a target and a squared threshold $Δ$ such that the closest squared distance is exactly $Δ$ in YES instances and at least $Δ+4$ in NO instances. This also implies $\mathsf{NP}$-hardness of exact search-CVP under polynomial-time Turing reductions. We also transfer the resulting principal-ideal CVP instances to full-rank principal ideals of the cyclic quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^D-1)$, where $D:=2d$. Their coefficient lattices are invariant under cyclic coordinate shifts. The lift preserves principality and multiplies corresponding squared distances by eight. Thus, on principal cyclic ideal lattices, exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete and exact search-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. We also obtain uniformly computable fixed cyclotomic and cyclic families in which only the target and threshold depend on the X3C collection. Consequently, a polynomial-time solution to exact decision-CVPP on either family would imply $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{P}/\mathrm{poly}$ and collapse the polynomial hierarchy to $Σ_2^{\mathsf{P}}$. To our knowledge, the cyclic results answer Micciancio's questions of whether exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard on cyclic lattices and on a fixed family of cyclic lattices, even when restricted to full-rank principal cyclic ideals. Finally, under the coefficient embedding, we prove that exact decision-module-SIVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on free rank-two modules over the same cyclotomic rings.

cs.CC

Fooling Thresholds of Halfspaces

We initiate the study of constructing explicit pseudorandom generators for thresholds of halfspaces with seed length polylogarithmic in the number of halfspaces. This class of functions lies at the frontier of circuit complexity [CTW26]. We show that the generator designed by O'Donnell, Servedio, and Tan for polytopes [OST22] also fools this broader class. To analyze the generator, we develop a threshold-specific smooth approximation framework based on a Bentkus-type mollifier. We prove derivative bounds for this mollifier and also establish a Boolean anticoncentration theorem for thresholds of halfspaces via a random thinning argument. These ingredients imply that the generator $δ$-fools every $k$-out-of-$m$ threshold of $m$ halfspaces over $\{-1,1\}^n$ with seed length $\widetilde{O}(κ^{6+2\varepsilon}\log^{6+2\varepsilon}\!m\cdotδ^{-(2+2\varepsilon)}\log n)$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon>0$, where $κ=\min\{k,m-k+1\}$. The random thinning argument also yields bounds on the noise sensitivity and Gaussian surface area for thresholds of halfspaces, leading to learning algorithms under both the uniform and Gaussian distributions.

cs.CC

An Oracle Separating Conjectures about Incompleteness in the Finite Domain

Pudlák [Pud17] lists several major conjectures from the field of proof complexity and asks for oracles that separate corresponding relativized conjectures. Among these conjectures are: - $\mathsf{DisjNP}$: The class of all disjoint NP-pairs does not have many-one complete elements. - $\mathsf{SAT}$: NP does not contain many-one complete sets that have P-optimal proof systems. - $\mathsf{UP}$: UP does not have many-one complete problems. - $\mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}$: $\text{NP}\cap\text{coNP}$ does not have many-one complete problems. As one answer to this question, we construct an oracle relative to which $\mathsf{DisjNP}$, $\neg \mathsf{SAT}$, $\mathsf{UP}$, and $\mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}$ hold, i.e., there is no relativizable proof for the implication $\mathsf{DisjNP}\wedge \mathsf{UP}\wedge \mathsf{NP}\cap\mathsf{coNP}\Rightarrow\mathsf{SAT}$. In particular, regarding the conjectures by Pudlák this extends a result by Khaniki [Kha19].

cs.CC