Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.02211

Bounds on the propagation radius in power domination

Abstract

Let $G$ be a graph and let $S \subseteq V(G)$. It is said that $S$ \textit{dominates} $N[S]$. We say that $S$ \textit{monitors} vertices of $G$ as follows. Initially, all dominated vertices are monitored. This step is called the \textit{domination} step. Thereafter, the set of unmonitored vertices of which each is the only unmonitored neighbour of a monitored vertex, is monitored. This step is called a \textit{propagation} step and is repeated until the process terminates. The process terminates when the there are no monitored vertices which have exactly one unmonitored neighbour. This combined process of initial domination and subsequent propagation is called \textit{power domination}. If all vertices of $G$ are monitored at termination, then $S$ is said to be a \textit{power dominating set (PDS) of $G$}. The \textit{power domination number of $G$}, denoted as $γ_p(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a PDS of $G$. The \textit{propagation radius of $G$} is the minimum number of steps it takes a minimum PDS to monitor $V(G)$. In this paper we determine an upper bound on the propagation radius of $G$ with regards to power domination, in terms of $δ$ and $n$. We show that this bound is only attained when $γ_p(G)=1$ and then improve this bound for $γ_p(G)\geq 2$. Sharpness examples for these bounds are provided. We also present sharp upper bounds on the propagation radius of split graphs. We present sharpness results for a known lower bound of the propagation radius for all $Δ\geq 3$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Imran Allie, Brandon du Preez, Dean Reagon, Adriana Roux. 2026-01-20. Bounds on the propagation radius in power domination. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02211

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO