Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.03668

Labor Market Reforms, Flexibility, and Employment Transitions Across Formal and Informal Sectors

Abstract

In this paper, I investigate the 2017 labor market reform in Benin, which reduced firing costs and allowed firms to renew short-term contracts indefinitely. Using micro-data from the Harmonized Household Living Standards Surveys and a two-way fixed effect approach with nearby countries as the control group, I assess the reform's impact on employment, worker tenure, contract types, and wages. My empirical results reveal a 2.6 percentage point (24.5 percent) increase in formal sector employment and a 2.8 percentage point (3.2 percent) reduction in informal employment. Formal sector tenure decreased by 0.23 months for short-term contract workers, reflecting higher turnover, while long-term contract tenure increased by 0.15 months. The likelihood of securing a permanent contract rose by 23.2 percentage points (41.6 percent) in the formal sector, indicating that firms used long-term contracts to retain high-productivity workers. Wages in the formal sector increased by 33.6 USD per month on average, with workers on short-term contracts experiencing a wage increase of 19.6 USD and those on long-term contracts seeing an increase of 23.4 USD. I complement these findings with a theoretical job search model, which explains the mechanisms through which lowered firing costs affected firm hiring decisions, market tightness, and the sorting of workers across sectors. This study provides robust evidence of labor market reallocation and highlights the complex trade-offs between flexibility, employment stability, and wages in a developing country context.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Selidji Caroline Tossou. 2025-10-04. Labor Market Reforms, Flexibility, and Employment Transitions Across Formal and Informal Sectors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03668

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN