Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.04471

The Smith normal form of distance matrices of high dimensional trees

Abstract

Graham-Lovász-Pollak \cite{GL,GP} obtained the celebrated formula $$\det({\sf D}(T_{n+1}))=(-1)^nn2^{n-1},$$ for the determinant of the distance matrix ${\sf D}(T_{n+1})$ for any tree $T_{n+1}$ with $n+1$ vertices. Later, Hou and Woo \cite{HW} extended this formula to the Smith normal form (SNF) obtaining that $\SNF({\sf D}(T_{n+1}))={\sf I}_2\oplus 2{\sf I}_{n-2}\oplus [2n]$, for any tree $T_{n+1}$ with $n+1$ vertices. A $k$-{\it tree} is either a complete graph on $k$ vertices or a graph obtained from a smaller $k$-tree by adjoining a new vertex together with $k$ edges connecting it to a $k$-clique. If $τ$ and $τ'$ are $d$-cliques in a $k$-tree $T$, a $d$-{\it walk} between $τ$ and $τ'$ is a finite sequence $τ_1σ_1τ_2σ_2\cdotsτ_l$, where $τ_1=τ$, $τ_l=τ'$, and the $d$-cliques $τ_i$ and $τ_{i+1}$ are incident to the same $(d+1)$-clique $σ_i$. For $d\in\{1,\dots,k\}$, the $d$-{\it distance} from the $d$-cliques $τ$ and $τ'$ is the number of $(d+1)$-cliques in a minimum $d$-walk from $τ$ and $τ'$, and is denoted by $\dist^d(τ,τ')$. Let $c_d$ denote the number of $d$-cliques in the $k$-tree $T$. Then the $d$-distance matrix ${\sf D}^d(T)$ of the $k$-tree $T$ is the $c_d\times c_d$ matrix, indexed by the $d$-cliques of $T$, such that the $(i,j)$-entry is $0$ if $i=j$, and $\dist^d(τ_i,τ_j)$ otherwise. Here, we show that, for $k$ and $n$ fixed, the SNF of the $k$-distance matrix is the same for any $k$-tree with $n$ vertices. Specifically, for any $k$-tree $T_{n}$ with $n$ vertices such that $n\geq k+2$, the Smith normal form of ${\sf D}^{k}(T_{n})$ is $${\sf I}_{(k-1)(n-k)+2}\oplus (k+1){\sf I}_{n-k-2}\oplus [k(k+1)(n-k)],$$ which extends Graham-Lovász-Pollak and Hou-Woo results.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carlos A. Alfaro, Jesús Uriel Medrano, Iván Téllez Téllez. 2025-10-06. The Smith normal form of distance matrices of high dimensional trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04471

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Orthogonal Pairs in Maps from the Sphere to the Circle

We prove that, for any $f:S^2\to S^1$ and any $\varepsilon>0$, there exist orthogonal vectors $x,y\in S^2$ such that the length of the shortest arc between $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ is at most $π/2 +\varepsilon$. This proves a conjecture of Ghebleh from 2007 that the circular chromatic number of the real orthogonality graph is equal to four.

math.CO

Exact Area-Range Minima in the Quantitative Monsky Problem for Five and Seven Triangles

For a dissection $D$ of the unit square into $n$ nondegenerate triangles, let $R(D)=\max_i a_i-\min_i a_i, Δ(n)=\inf_D R(D).$ We prove that this infimum is attained for every $n\ge2$, and determine the exact minima for $n=5$ and $n=7$, allowing T-junctions. For five triangles, $Δ(5)=\frac{5\sqrt5-11}{8};$ equality holds precisely when three areas equal $(3-\sqrt5)/4$ and two equal $(3\sqrt5-5)/8$. For seven triangles, $Δ(7)=r_7$, where $r_7$ is the unique root in $(0,1/4900)$ of $864r^4+2160r^3-6060r^2+4972r-1.$ Every minimizer has four areas $(1+3r_7)/7$ and three areas $(1-4r_7)/7$, although its geometry need not be unique. The proofs combine finite combinatorial classification with exact symbolic and integer-interval certificates. For nine triangles, a tilted-strip construction gives the explicit algebraic upper bound $Δ(9)\le 0.0001273496861283553341\ldots,$ which is the exact minimum within that topology. Conversely, every dissection in the complete single-cap two-rail zig-zag family, with arbitrary continuous areas, has range greater than $1/3500$; hence a global minimizer must lie outside that family. The exact value of $Δ(9)$ remains open.

math.CO

Chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs

We introduce a combinatorial definition of chromatic symmetric functions for annular webs. We prove their symmetry by constructing a web analogue of the Shareshian--Wachs involution and show that they coincide with the symmetric functions associated to annular webs via Turaev's isomorphism. We then derive explicit formulas for their hook Schur coefficients. We also introduce web LLT functions, whose hook Schur coefficients admit positive Laurent-polynomial formulas. These formulas yield a combinatorial expression for the coefficients of the HOMFLY--PT polynomial of an annular web.

math.CO