Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.05812

The challenge of employee motivation in business management

Abstract

This study investigates the role of employee motivation as a critical factor in effective business management and explores how financial and non-financial motivators shape engagement and performance. Based on a quantitative survey of 102 employees, the research analyzes differences in motivation levels across gender, age, and work experience, as well as the perceived effectiveness of various motivational tools. The findings indicate that financial incentives, particularly bonuses for achieving targets, are the most influential motivators, while non-financial factors such as flexible work schedules, additional leave, career development opportunities, and workplace atmosphere also play a crucial role in enhancing motivation. Significant variations in motivation were observed, with men, older employees, and those with longer tenure reporting higher levels. The study also reveals that work-life balance initiatives substantially increase motivation, highlighting the importance of combining financial and non-financial strategies to achieve optimal results. The results provide actionable insights for managers seeking to design effective motivation systems, showing that tailored, multifaceted approaches can improve employee satisfaction, retention, and organizational performance. Future research could explore cultural and sectoral differences and examine the evolving importance of motivational factors in remote and hybrid work environments.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Anna Kasperczuk, Michał Ćwiąkała, Ernest Górka, Dariusz Baran, Piotr Ręczajski, Piotr Mrzygłód, Maciej Frasunkiewicz, Agnieszka Dardzińska-Głębocka, Jan Piwnik. 2025-10-07. The challenge of employee motivation in business management. https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2025.216.11

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN