Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.06316

Quantum matrix arithmetics with Hamiltonian evolution

Abstract

The efficient implementation of matrix arithmetic operations underpins the speedups of many quantum algorithms. We develop a suite of methods to perform matrix arithmetics -- with the result encoded in the off-diagonal blocks of a Hamiltonian -- using Hamiltonian evolutions of input operators. We show how to maintain this $\textit{Hamiltonian block encoding}$, so that matrix operations can be composed one after another, and the entire quantum computation takes $\leq 2$ ancilla qubits. We achieve this for matrix multiplication, matrix addition, matrix inversion, Hermitian conjugation, fractional scaling, integer scaling, complex phase scaling, as well as singular value transformation for both odd and even polynomials. We also present an overlap estimation algorithm to extract classical properties of Hamiltonian block encoded operators, analogous to the well known Hadamard test, at no extra cost of qubit. Our Hamiltonian matrix multiplication uses the Lie group commutator product formula and its higher-order generalizations due to Childs and Wiebe. Our Hamiltonian singular value transformation employs a dominated polynomial approximation, where the approximation holds within the domain of interest, while the constructed polynomial is upper bounded by the target function over the entire unit interval. We describe a circuit for simulating a class of sum-of-squares Hamiltonians, attaining a commutator scaling in step count, while leveraging the power of matrix arithmetics to reduce the cost of each simulation step. In particular, we apply this to the doubly factorized tensor hypercontracted Hamiltonians from recent studies of quantum chemistry, obtaining further improvements for initial states with a fixed number of particles. We achieve this with $1$ ancilla qubit.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Christopher Kang, Yuan Su. 2026-09-01. Quantum matrix arithmetics with Hamiltonian evolution. https://doi.org/10.1145/3816436

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes

This is a set of lecture notes suitable for a Master's course on quantum computation and information from the perspective of theoretical computer science. The first version was written in 2011, with many extensions and improvements in subsequent years. The first 10 chapters cover the circuit model and the main quantum algorithms (Deutsch-Jozsa, Simon, Shor, Hidden Subgroup Problem, Grover, quantum walks, Hamiltonian simulation and HHL). They are followed by 4 chapters about complexity, 4 chapters about distributed ("Alice and Bob") settings, a chapter about quantum machine learning, one about stabilizer states and Clifford circuits, and a final chapter about quantum error correction. Appendices A and B give a brief introduction to the required linear algebra and some other mathematical and computer science background. All chapters come with exercises, with some hints provided in Appendix C.

quant-ph

Gate-Efficient Implementation of the Query-Optimal Time-Dependent Hamiltonian Simulation

The query-optimal algorithm of [CGWZ26] for general time-dependent Hamiltonian simulation uses $$ q = O\left( αT + \frac{\log(1/\varepsilon)}{\log\left(e + \log(1/\varepsilon)/(αT) \right)} \right) $$ queries to $\mathrm{HAM\mbox{-}T}$ within $\varepsilon$ error for a Lipschitz-continuous time-dependent Hamiltonian $H(t)$ on $[0,T]$ satisfying $\left\lVert H(t)\right\rVert\leqα$. However, its direct circuit implementation incurs a substantially larger gate overhead. In this note, we give an implementation of the same algorithm that retains its optimal query complexity and uses $$ O\left[ q \left( a + \log\left(1 + \frac{T(α+ βT)}{\varepsilon} \right) \right) \right] $$ one- and two-qubit gates, where $a$ is the number of block-encoding ancilla qubits and $β$ is the Lipschitz constant of $H$. The main ingredient is an exact dyadic factorization of the ordered update product in the underlying one-query transducer.

quant-ph

Mathematical and numerical analysis of quantum signal processing

Quantum signal processing (QSP) provides a representation of scalar polynomials of degree $d$ as products of matrices in $\mathrm{SU}(2)$, parameterized by $(d+1)$ real numbers known as phase factors. QSP is the mathematical foundation of quantum singular value transformation (QSVT), which is often regarded as one of the most important quantum algorithms of the past decade, with a wide range of applications in scientific computing, from Hamiltonian simulation to solving linear systems of equations and eigenvalue problems. In this article we survey recent advances in the mathematical and numerical analysis of QSP. In particular, we focus on its generalization beyond polynomials, the computational complexity of algorithms for phase factor evaluation, and the numerical stability of such algorithms. The resolution to some of these problems relies on an unexpected interplay between QSP, nonlinear Fourier analysis on $\mathrm{SU}(2)$, fast polynomial multiplications, and Gaussian elimination for matrices with displacement structure.

quant-ph