Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2510.10268

Neural Variational Cut Posteriors without Upstream Data

Abstract

In many applications, one must propagate parameter uncertainty from an earlier (upstream) analysis, available as samples, to subsequent (downstream) analyses without feedback. This problem is called cutting feedback or cut-Bayes, and the cut-posterior, the optimal posterior preserving information-flow constraints, is well characterized. However, sampling from it (e.g., via nested MCMC) is computationally intensive, while existing variational inference methods for cut-Bayes require access to upstream data and model, often unavailable. We propose a modular and provably accurate cut-Bayes approach requiring no access to upstream data or model. We leverage the characterization of the cut-posterior as the minimizer of the expected downstream conditional Kullback-Leibler divergence over the upstream posterior, replacing the expectation with the sample average over upstream draws. Our method, NeVI-Cut (neural variational inference for cut-Bayes), employs conditional normalizing flows as the variational family for downstream parameters. We provide fixed-data convergence rates of NeVI-Cut in terms of the richness of neural architecture and complexity of the cut-posterior. We establish, to our knowledge, first results on uniform Kullback-Leibler approximation rates of conditional distributions by common flow classes, yielding widely applicable fixed-data error rates for variational flows. A stochastic algorithm implements NeVI-Cut efficiently, and we demonstrate its speed and accuracy on multiple applications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Jiafang Song, Sandipan Pramanik, Abhirup Datta. 2026-09-02. Neural Variational Cut Posteriors without Upstream Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10268

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Clustering Three-Way Data with Outliers

Matrix-variate distributions are a relatively recent addition to the model-based clustering literature, thereby making it possible to analyze data in matrix form with complex structure such as images and time series. Due to its recent appearance, there is limited literature on matrix-variate data, with even less on dealing with outliers in these models. An approach for clustering matrix-variate normal data with outliers is discussed. The approach, which uses the distribution of subset log-likelihoods, extends the OCLUST algorithm to matrix-variate normal data and uses an iterative approach to detect and trim outliers.

stat.ML

Robust conditional dimension reduction for dissimilarity data

Conditional dimension reduction (cDR) learns low-dimensional latent coordinates while accounting for observed covariates that represent known sources of variation in the data. Conditional Multidimensional Scaling (cMDS) is a cDR technique that works directly with dissimilarity data. Its standard squared-stress formulation, however, is sensitive to contaminated dissimilarity, since outliers can dominate the objective and distort the learned configuration. We proposed Robust Conditional Multidimensional Scaling (rcMDS) by replacing the squared-stress criterion with a Fair M-estimation objective. We developed a reweighted conditional SMACOF algorithm to optimize this objective. The proposed algorithm admits computationally tractable updates, and its stabilized objective values decrease monotonically and converge to a finite limit. Experiments on synthetic and real data show that the pro

stat.ML

The Role of Uncertainty in Assessing the Fairness of Machine Learning Models

Machine learning models are widely used in clinical applications, social media, law enforcement and critical infrastructure. Verifying whether their outputs are biased against disadvantaged groups or individuals is crucial to ensuring they are fair and allowing their use in such settings. A rigorous risk assessment of possible fairness violations requires quantifying the uncertainty associated with selecting and estimating such models. Yet, this is rarely done in the literature, which focuses on identifying a single model with a suitable trade-off between predictive accuracy and fairness. In this paper, we move beyond point estimation and discuss frequentist and Bayesian approaches to uncertainty quantification for fair machine learning, with practical examples and implications for simulated and real data.

stat.ML