Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.15572

Residual Kriging for Regional-Scale Canopy Height Mapping: Insights into GEDI-Induced Anisotropies and Sparse Sampling

Kamel Lahssini·Guerric le Maire·Nicolas Baghdadi·Ibrahim Fayad
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Quantifying aboveground biomass (AGB) is essential in the context of global climate change. Canopy height, which is related to AGB, can be mapped using machine learning models trained with multi-source spatial data and GEDI measurements. In this study, a comparative analysis of canopy height estimates derived from two models is presented: a U-Net deep learning model (CHNET) and a Random Forest algorithm (RFH). Both models were trained using GEDI lidar data and utilized multi-source inputs, including optical, radar, and environmental data. While CHNET can leverage its convolutional architecture to account for spatial correlations, we observed that it does not fully incorporate all the spatial autocorrelation present in GEDI canopy height measurements. By conducting a spatial analysis of the models' residuals, we also identified that GEDI data acquisition parameters, particularly the variability in laser beam energy combined with the azimuthal directions of the observation tracks, introduce spatial inconsistencies in the measurements in the form of periodic patterns. To address these anisotropies, we considered exclusively GEDI power beams, and we conducted our spatial autocorrelation analysis in the GEDI track azimuthal direction. Next, we employed the residual kriging (RK) spatial interpolation technique to account for the spatial autocorrelation of canopy heights and improve the accuracies of CHNET and RFH estimates. Adding RK corrections improved the performance of both CHNET and RFH, with more substantial gains observed for RFH. The corrections appeared to be localized around the GEDI sample points and the density of usable GEDI information is therefore an important factor in the effectiveness of spatial interpolation. Furthermore, our findings reveal that a Random Forest model combined with spatial interpolation can deliver performance comparable to that of a U-Net model alone.

Explore related subjects

stat.APphysics.geo-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kamel Lahssini, Guerric le Maire, Nicolas Baghdadi, Ibrahim Fayad. 2025-10-17. Residual Kriging for Regional-Scale Canopy Height Mapping: Insights into GEDI-Induced Anisotropies and Sparse Sampling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.15572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Auditing Bayesian Graph Alignment: Diagnostic Comparisons and Reference Failure

Bayesian graph alignment estimates correspondence probabilities, but convergence of an alignment-score trace need not imply accurate correspondence marginals. We audit this gap on 240 new exact graph pairs from four source families, 240 larger pairs with 20-100 vertices, and a separate 60-case exact implementation check. Under an explicit edge-flip likelihood, we compare three samplers and score, marginal, indicator, categorical, and classifier-based diagnostics. Marginal disagreement improves error discrimination over score R-hat for the exact informed sampler, but its improvement for vanilla local sampling is uncertain. Assignment-based R* and short indicator panels are competitive; no diagnostic dominates across samplers and endpoints. At larger sizes, diagnostics predict subsequent marginal changes, not posterior error, and classification performance depends on the drift threshold. Disjoint-window and held-out-chain checks attenuate but preserve positive associations. Only 22 of 240 original reference sets pass an agreement screen. On forty failure-selected cases, eightfold SMC particle escalation does not resolve disagreement, whereas additional rejuvenation helps. Longer informed runs remain unstable. An elementary feasible-alignment bound demonstrates severely unrepresentative SMC and informed-chain scores in concentrated 100-vertex cases, independently of approximate reference consensus. We also exhibit common-start chains with near-zero disagreement despite exact marginal error near .967. These results support assignment-sensitive auditing while identifying limits of finite budgets, diagnostic rankings, and reference agreement as evidence of accuracy.

stat.AP↗
arXiv2026

GeoDose-CP: Graph-Local Conformal Inference for Continuous-Treatment Earth Observation

Reliable intervention-oriented uncertainty quantification from Earth observation (EO) remains challenging when continuous treatment shifts, spatial dependence, limited support, and satellite-outcome uncertainty must be addressed simultaneously. Existing causal, conformal, and spatial approaches address parts of this problem, but their direct combination does not generally recover the appropriate interventional reference law because candidate reassignment jointly alters treatment likelihood, standardized residuals, and graph-dependent residual likelihood. This study presents GeoDose-CP, a support-aware conformal framework for localized stochastic potential outcomes under continuous or mixed continuous-atomic treatment. Its central methodological contribution is a graph-local target-orbit law that jointly represents intervention-induced treatment shift, the inverse outcome-scale Jacobian, and spatial residual dependence. The framework further provides exact weighted candidate inversion, a scalable sparse approximation with explicit discrepancy accounting, and refusal under inadequate support. Evaluation used controlled known-truth experiments, MineDoseBench, treatment-density sensitivity analysis, external conformal comparators, and a multi-mine New South Wales (NSW) study. In MineDoseBench, GeoDose-CP achieved mean selective coverage of 0.9692 across 27 configurations and a minimum local q0.05 of 0.8951; exact-sparse auditing produced nine inclusion disagreements over 2,700 targets. In the NSW study, the absence of an auditable longitudinal rehabilitation treatment rendered treatment-dependent inference nonoperational rather than forcing inference through a proxy exposure.

stat.AP↗
arXiv2026

Interpreting relative utility for probabilistic predictions

At a fixed threshold, relative utility (RU) measures the net-benefit gain of a prediction model over the better of treat-all and treat-none relative to the corresponding gain under perfect outcome classification. We illustrate that RU equal to 1 therefore represents perfect outcome classification at that fixed threshold, not perfect probabilistic prediction. However, even when every predicted probability equals the true probability, observed RU can equal 0. In a simple constant-risk setting, this occurs with probability approaching 1 as the sample size increases. Consequently, the distance from observed RU to 1 should not in general be interpreted as improvement achievable by a better prediction for binary probabilities.

stat.AP↗