Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2510.16055

Is Zadeh's Least-Entered Pivot Rule Exponential?

Norman Zadeh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 2011, Friedmann [F 7] claimed to have proved that pathological linear programs existed for which the Simplex method using Zadeh's least-entered rule [Z 14] would take an exponential number of pivots. In 2019, Disser and Hopp [DH 5] argued that there were errors in Friedmann's 2011 construction. In 2020, Disser, Friedmann, and Hopp [DFH 3,4] again contended that the least-entered rule was exponential. We show that their arguments contain multiple flaws. In other words, the worst-case behavior of the least-entered rule has not been established. Neither [F 7] nor [DFH 3,4] provides pathological linear programs that can be tested. Instead, the authors contend that their pathological linear programs are of the form (P) as shown on page 12 of [DFH 3]. The authors contend that the constraints of (P) ensure that the probability of entering a vertex u is equal to the probability of exiting u. In fact, we note that the authors' constraints (P) are flawed in at least three ways: a) they require the probability of exiting u to exceed the probability of entering u, b) they require the probability of exiting some nodes to exceed 1, and c) they overlook flows from decision nodes to decision nodes. At my request, in August of 2025, Disser, Friedmann, and Hopp provided me with their first ten purportedly pathological LPs and the graph of their first purportedly pathological Markov Decision Process (MDP1). It is shown that: a) their first two pathological LPs are infeasible if the variables are supposed to be probabilities, as the authors contend, and b) their first purportedly pathological LP does not match up with their first purportedly pathological MDP. In other words, the authors have not come close to providing counterexamples to the least-entered rule.

Explore related subjects

cs.DSmath.OC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Norman Zadeh. 2025-10-16. Is Zadeh's Least-Entered Pivot Rule Exponential?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Approximating Prize-Collecting TSP below 1.556

The prize-collecting traveling salesperson problem is a variant of the metric traveling salesperson problem in which vertices may be left unvisited by paying their associated penalties. The objective is to minimize the length of the tour plus the total penalty of the unvisited vertices. Blauth, Klein, and Nägele gave the previously best-known LP-relative $1.599$-approximation. We show that a simpler version of their algorithm, obtained by omitting the splitting-off preprocessing before the tree decomposition, has an LP-relative approximation ratio of $1.555761$. The improvement comes entirely from a new analysis of the parity-correction step: a simple analysis already gives $1.56$, and the stated factor follows from a numerical parameter search with exact verification.

cs.DS↗