Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2511.00616

Bipartite holes, degree sums and Hamilton cycles

Abstract

The {\em bipartite-hole-number} of a graph $G$, denoted as $\widetildeα(G)$, is the minimum number $k$ such that there exist integers $a$ and $b$ with $a + b = k+1$ such that for any two disjoint sets $A, B \subseteq V(G)$, there is an edge between $A$ and $B$. McDiarmid and Yolov initiated research on bipartite holes by extending Dirac's classical theorem on minimum degree and Hamiltonian cycles. They showed that a graph on at least three vertices with $δ(G) \ge \widetildeα(G)$ is Hamiltonian. Later, Draganić, Munhá Correia and Sudakov proved that $δ\ge \widetildeα(G)$ implies that $G$ is pancyclic, unless $G = K_{\frac n2, \frac n2}$. This extended the result of McDiarmid and Yolov and generalized a theorem of Bondy on pancyclicity. In this paper, we show that a $2$-connected graph $G$ is Hamiltonian if $σ_2(G) \ge 2 \widetildeα(G) - 1$, and that a connected graph $G$ contains a cycle through all vertices of degree at least $\widetildeα(G)$. Both results extended McDiarmid and Yolov's result. As a step toward proving pancyclicity, we show that if an $n$-vertex graph $G$ satisfies $σ_2(G) \ge 2 \widetildeα(G) - 1$, then it either contains a triangle or it is $K_{\frac n2, \frac n2}$. Finally, we discuss the relationship between connectivity and the bipartite hole number.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark Ellingham, Yixuan Huang, Bing Wei. 2025-11-01. Bipartite holes, degree sums and Hamilton cycles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00616

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO↗

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO↗

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO↗