Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2511.05287

Logarithmic Newton polygons and polytopes, and the factorization of Dirichlet polynomials

Abstract

To study a Dirichlet polynomial $f(s)=\frac{a_{m}}{m^{s}}+\cdots +\frac{a_{n}}{n^{s}}$ by regarding it as a multivariate polynomial via the canonical map $ϕ$ sending $p_i^{-s}$ to an indeterminate $X_i$, with $p_i$ the $i$th prime number, requires knowing the prime factorizations of all the integers in the support of $f$. We devise several methods to study the factorization of Dirichlet polynomials over unique factorization domains that circumvent the use of $ϕ$, and obtain irreducibility criteria that are analogous to the classical results of Schönemann, Eisenstein, Dumas, Stäckel, Ore and Weisner for polynomials, and to more recent results of Filaseta and Cavachi. Some of the proofs rely on logarithmic versions of the classical Newton polygons. Criteria that use two or more $p$-adic valuations by combining information from different logarithmic Newton polygons of $f$, as well as irreducibility conditions for Dirichlet polynomials that assume a prime or a prime power value are also obtained. We also find excluding intervals for the relative degrees of the factors of a Dirichlet polynomial, and upper bounds for the multiplicities of the irreducible factors, in particular square-free criteria, that use no derivatives. Criteria of absolute irreducibility analogous to results of Ostrowski, Gao and Stepanov-Schmidt are finally provided in the multivariate case by using logarithmic Newton polytopes and logarithmic upper Newton polygons.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicolae Ciprian Bonciocat. 2025-11-07. Logarithmic Newton polygons and polytopes, and the factorization of Dirichlet polynomials. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05287

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT