Who's Afraid of the Wallenius Distribution?

Linda M. Haines

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.08088

Who's Afraid of the Wallenius Distribution?

Linda M. Haines

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper is about the use of the Wallenius noncentral hypergeometric distribution for analysing contingency tables with two or more groups and two categories and with row margins and sample size, that is both margins, fixed. The parameters of the distribution are taken to be weights which are positive and sum to one and are thus defined on a regular simplex. The approach to analysis is presented for likelihood-based and Bayesian inference and is illustrated by example, with datasets taken from the literature and, in one case, used to generate semi-synthetic data. The analysis of two-by-two contingency tables using the univariate Wallenius distribution is shown to be straightforward, with the parameter a single weight which translates immediately to the requisite odds and the odds ratio. The analysis of contingency tables with more than two groups based on the multivariate Wallenius distribution was however more nuanced than that of the two-group tables. Specifically, some numerical subtleties were required in order to implement the necessary calculations. In particular, optimisation with respect to the weights was performed by transforming the weights to yield an unconstrained optimisation problem and likelihoods which are extremely small were scaled by an appropriate multiplying factor without compromising the elements of inference. Furthermore, a novel Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm for Bayesian inference, termed the sphere walk Metropolis, was constructed. The proposal is implemented in Cartesian coordinates on the reference simplex and the Metropolis filter in barycentric coordinates on the regular simplex, with the transition between barycentric and Cartesian coordinates effected seamlessly.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Linda M. Haines. 2025-11-11. Who's Afraid of the Wallenius Distribution?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08088

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Efficient and scalable clustering of survival curves

Survival analysis encompasses a broad range of methods for analyzing time-to-event data, with one key objective being the comparison of survival curves across groups. Traditional approaches for identifying clusters of survival curves often rely on computationally intensive bootstrap techniques to approximate the null hypothesis distribution. While effective, these methods impose significant computational burdens. In this work, we propose a novel approach that leverages the k-means and log-rank test to efficiently identify and cluster survival curves. Our method eliminates the need for computationally expensive resampling, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining statistical reliability. By systematically evaluating survival curves and determining optimal clusters, the proposed method ensures a practical and scalable alternative for large-scale survival data analysis. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that our approach achieves results comparable to existing bootstrap-based clustering methods while dramatically improving computational efficiency. These findings suggest that the log-rank-based clustering procedure offers a viable and time-efficient solution for researchers working with multiple survival curves in medical and epidemiological studies.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Bayesian Modular Inference for Copula Models with Potentially Misspecified Marginals

Copula models of multivariate data are popular because they allow separate specification of marginal distributions and the copula function. These components can be treated as inter-related modules in a modified Bayesian inference approach called ''cutting feedback'' that is robust to their misspecification. Recent work uses a two module approach, where all $d$ marginals form a single module, to robustify inference for the marginals against copula function misspecification, or vice versa. However, marginals can exhibit differing levels of misspecification, making it attractive to assign each its own module with an individual influence parameter controlling its contribution to a joint semi-modular inference (SMI) posterior. This generalizes existing two module SMI methods, which interpolate between cut and conventional posteriors using a single influence parameter. We develop a novel copula SMI method and select the influence parameters using Bayesian optimization. It provides an efficient continuous relaxation of the discrete optimization problem over $2^d$ cut/uncut configurations. We establish theoretical properties of the resulting semi-modular posterior and demonstrate the approach on simulated and real data. The real data application uses a skew-normal copula model of asymmetric dependence between equity volatility and bond yields, where robustifying copula estimation against marginal misspecification is strongly motivated.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

On Asymptotic Outlier Rejection in Bayesian Mixed Poisson Regression Models Under Extreme Target and Covariate Values

Bayesian models are defined to be fully robust against outliers if observations infinitely far from the other data do not influence the posterior. In regression models, this entails a need to consider outliers in both target and covariate values. While in linear regression these cases are interchangeable, as both lead to anomalously large residuals, this symmetry does not apply to generalized linear models. Importantly, Hamura et al. (2025, arXiv:2106.10503) presented sufficient conditions for mixed Poisson count regression models to be robust against infinitely large target values and proposed a mixed Poisson-Rescaled Beta model fulfilling these conditions. We continue from their work and study the robustness properties of mixed Poisson regression models with Gaussian latent variables in the presence of outliers in covariates. We show that in count regression the symmetry between covariate and target outliers breaks: mixed Poisson models are not robust to outlier covariates even if they were robust to target outliers. Furthermore, we show that, as a covariate gets infinitely large, the corresponding regression coefficient posterior collapses to a point-mass distribution concentrated around zero. We hence introduce a novel robustified mixed Poisson model which we denote as $x$-outlier rejective ($x$-OR) mixed Poisson, and demonstrate its theoretical and practical ability to accommodate outliers in the covariates. We investigate robustness properties of alternative ($x$-OR) mixed Poisson models in the presence of moderate outliers with simulations and a real world case study and show that the $x$-OR log-$t$ and Rescaled Beta mixed Poisson models reject both types of outliers, leading to improved inference.

stat.ME↗