Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2511.10167

Positive Logic: An Introduction for Model Theorists

Abstract

Positive logic is a generalisation of full first-order logic that does not have negation built in. Still, many model-theoretic ideas, tools and techniques work perfectly fine in positive logic. Importantly, there is a compactness theorem. With some care, many classical results hold in the generality of positive logic without giving up any strength. In these self-contained notes we give an introduction to model theory in positive logic. We give a complete treatment of the basics of positive model theory and then we move on to deeper model-theoretic concepts. First, we discuss countable categoricity, where we work towards a theorem that characterises countably categorical positive theories. After that, we briefly discuss how the convenient formalism of monster models goes through in positive logic as usual. This is helpful in the remainder of the notes, where we discuss simple and stable theories. The main aim in those chapters is to develop dividing independence and prove Kim-Pillay style theorems. For a smoother treatment we assume thickness, which is the relatively mild assumption that being an indiscernible sequence is type-definable. We finish by discussing two big applications of positive logic: hyperimaginaries and continuous logic. For the former we define an $(-)^{\text{heq}}$ construction, analogous to the $(-)^{\text{eq}}$ construction for imaginaries in full first-order logic. Where the $(-)^{\text{heq}}$ construction is problematic in full first-order logic, it does stay within the framework in positive logic and it preserves many nice properties. For the latter we explain how continuous logic can be studied as a special case of positive logic, making it so that all abstract model-theoretic results in positive logic apply to continuous theories. In the appendix we provide a quick guide to the material covered in these notes, including very brief proof sketches.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mark Kamsma. 2025-11-13. Positive Logic: An Introduction for Model Theorists. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10167

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Natural Term Logic

In this paper we develop a formal system called Natural Term Logic (NTL). NTL aims to represent key aspects of the logical and grammatical mechanisms of natural language as well as grammatical transformations which preserve core logical meaning. NTL can be seen as a refinement of the ideas of Quine's paper `Variables Explained Away' and the technical concepts introduced by Bealer and Zalta. NTL is more fine-grained than Bealer's first-order intensional logic (BL): there is a many-to-one correspondence $ν$ between NTL terms and closed BL terms as well as a canonical map $β$ which assigns to each closed BL term a corresponding NTL term. The map $ν$ can be seen as assigning a core logical content of the NTL term. We define a series of reductions on NTL terms which intuitivelyy speaking capture meaning-preserving syntactic transformations ( transformations which preserved the basic logical meaning of a term) and our main result is that each NTL term $T$ reduces to a unique normal term $N$. The reductions fall into the structural, predicative and pushing-in categories. Predicative reductions decompose NTL terms so that predication is only applied to a primitive term (such terms are called prenormal). A key ingredient in the proof is the fact that $βνN = N$ when $N$ is normal. This suggests that within NTL the normal form of a term expresses the core logical content of the term.

math.LO

Hyper-hyperfiniteness and complexity

We show that if there exists a countable Borel equivalence relation which is hyper-hyperfinite but not hyperfinite, then the complexity of hyperfinite countable Borel equivalence relationsis as high as possible, namely, $Σ^1_2$-complete. We also establish an implication between the question of the effectivity of hyperfiniteness and its complexity.

math.LO