Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2511.10883

Johnson's axioms revisited: Bases for Boolean algebras containing identities of associative type. I

Abstract

This paper is inspired by 1892 paper of Johnson, where he has given an axiomatization for the variety of Boolean algebras (equivalently, for classical propositional calculus). The fact that the axioms of Johnson include the associative law, the most well-known identity of associative type of length 3, led us naturally to the question as to whether there are axiom systems for Boolean algebras that include an identity of associative type, other than the associative law. It turns out that the answer to this question is positive in the strongest sense possible. In fact, corresponding to each of the 14 nonequivalent identities of associative type, there is a base containing that identity. Our goal, in this sequence of papers, of which the present paper is the first, is to describe bases for Boolean algebras, each of which contains at least one identity of associative type of length 3. In this paper, we prove, firstly, that the third axiom of Johnson is redundant. Secondly, we give several equational bases, some 2-bases and some 3-bases, for the variety of Boolean algebras, each containing an identity of associative type, other than the associative law. Each of these bases can be easily converted into an axiomatization for the classical propositional logic, as well.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hanamantagouda P. Sankappanavar. 2025-11-14. Johnson's axioms revisited: Bases for Boolean algebras containing identities of associative type. I. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10883

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Natural Term Logic

In this paper we develop a formal system called Natural Term Logic (NTL). NTL aims to represent key aspects of the logical and grammatical mechanisms of natural language as well as grammatical transformations which preserve core logical meaning. NTL can be seen as a refinement of the ideas of Quine's paper `Variables Explained Away' and the technical concepts introduced by Bealer and Zalta. NTL is more fine-grained than Bealer's first-order intensional logic (BL): there is a many-to-one correspondence $ν$ between NTL terms and closed BL terms as well as a canonical map $β$ which assigns to each closed BL term a corresponding NTL term. The map $ν$ can be seen as assigning a core logical content of the NTL term. We define a series of reductions on NTL terms which intuitivelyy speaking capture meaning-preserving syntactic transformations ( transformations which preserved the basic logical meaning of a term) and our main result is that each NTL term $T$ reduces to a unique normal term $N$. The reductions fall into the structural, predicative and pushing-in categories. Predicative reductions decompose NTL terms so that predication is only applied to a primitive term (such terms are called prenormal). A key ingredient in the proof is the fact that $βνN = N$ when $N$ is normal. This suggests that within NTL the normal form of a term expresses the core logical content of the term.

math.LO

Hyper-hyperfiniteness and complexity

We show that if there exists a countable Borel equivalence relation which is hyper-hyperfinite but not hyperfinite, then the complexity of hyperfinite countable Borel equivalence relationsis as high as possible, namely, $Σ^1_2$-complete. We also establish an implication between the question of the effectivity of hyperfiniteness and its complexity.

math.LO