Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2511.16023

Real Time Proportional Throughput Maximization: How much advance notice should you give your scheduler?

Nadim A. Mottu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We will be exploring a generalization of real time scheduling problem sometimes called the real time throughput maximization problem. Our input is a sequence of jobs specified by their release time, deadline and processing time. We assume that jobs are announced before or at their release time. At each time step, the algorithm must decide whether to schedule a job based on the information so far. The goal is to maximize the value of the sum of the processing times of jobs that finish before their deadline, this is often called real time throughput with proportional weights. We extend this problem by defining a notion of \(t\)-advance-notice, a measure of how far in advance each job is announced relative to their processing time. We show that there exists a class of algorithms \(τ-\textsc{Persist}\) parametrized by some value \(τ\in [1,\infty)\). If an input sequence has \(t\)-advance-notice, \(τ-\textsc{Persist}\) is \(\frac{τ- 1}{τ^2 +τ- 1}\)-competitive. In particular, we show that for any \(t \leq \frac{1}{2}\), there is an algorithm that achieves \(\frac{t-t^2}{1+t-t^2}\)-competitiveness and for any \(t \geq \frac{1}{2}\), there is an algorithm that achieves \(\frac{1}{5}\)-competitiveness. We also give an upper bound of any algorithm that relies on input sequences having \(t\)-advance-notice. We show that the competitive ratio of any algorithm can be at most \(\frac{t}{2t+1}\) against input sequences that have \(t\)-advance-notice. In particular, we show that regardless of how much advance-notice is given, no algorithm can reach \(\frac{1}{2}\)-competitiveness.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nadim A. Mottu. 2026-06-26. Real Time Proportional Throughput Maximization: How much advance notice should you give your scheduler?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16023

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Independent Set Reconfiguration via Dilworth Decompositions

The Token Jumping and Sliding Token problems are fundamental reconfiguration problems defined on the independent sets of an undirected graph. Given two independent sets $I$ and $J$, each of size $k$, these problems ask whether there exists a sequence of elementary operations transforming $I$ into $J$ such that every intermediate configuration is also an independent set of size $k$. Suppose a token is placed on each vertex of $I$: in Sliding Token, an operation moves a token from a vertex $u \in I$ to an adjacent vertex $v \notin I$; in Token Jumping, the token may instead move to any vertex $v \notin I$. While both problems are $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-complete on general graphs, polynomial-time algorithms for one or both variants have been developed for several graph classes, including trees, block graphs, bipartite permutation graphs, cographs, $P_4$-tidy graphs, and interval graphs. In this paper, we prove that both problems are solvable in polynomial time on threshold signed graphs, also known as Dilworth-2 graphs. A graph $G=(V,E)$ is a threshold signed graph if there exist a mapping $a:V\to\mathbb{R}$ and positive real constants $S,T>0$ such that $|a(v)|< \min\{S,T\}$ for all $v \in V$, and for any distinct vertices $u,v\in V$, $\{u,v\}\in E$ if and only if $|a(u)+a(v)|\ge S$ or $|a(u)-a(v)|\ge T$. More generally, we also show that Token Jumping can be solved in time $n^{O(\mathcal{D}(G))}$, where $\mathcal{D}(G)$ denotes the Dilworth number of $G$. Thus, Token Jumping belongs to $\mathsf{XP}$ when parameterised by the Dilworth number. This graph class is a subclass of permutation graphs, for which the complexity of these problems remains open, and is incomparable with the class of bipartite permutation graphs studied by Fox-Epstein et al. (ISAAC, 2015).

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Matrix Spencer: Eight Standard Deviations Suffice and an Almost-Linear Time Algorithm for Dense Input

The Matrix Spencer conjecture asserts that for all symmetric matrices $A_1,\ldots,A_n\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$ with $\|A_i\|\le1$ there are signs $\varepsilon_1,\ldots,\varepsilon_n\in\{-1,1\}$ with $\|\sum_{i=1}^n\varepsilon_iA_i\|=O(\sqrt n)$. We prove it: a signing of discrepancy below $8\sqrt n$ always exists. We also give a randomized algorithm that finds a signing of discrepancy below $12\sqrt n$ with failure probability at most $p$. The algorithm uses $n^{3+o(1)}\operatorname{polylog}(1/p)$ arithmetic operations in the real-arithmetic model. This matches the size $n^3$ of the dense input up to subpolynomial factors. In the other direction, we prove that for every $n$ there are collections of symmetric matrices such that every signing has discrepancy at least $(2-o(1))\sqrt{n}$. We present three different proofs of the matrix Spencer conjecture. The key to every proof is a hereditary small-ball estimate. This is a lower bound on the Gaussian measure of the spectral body $\{x\in \mathbb{R}^n:\|\sum_ix_iA_i\|\le R\}$ that holds for every subfamily of the matrices. The other ingredient turns that Gaussian measure into a partial signing. We give three approaches to obtain such a signing. The first one covers the cube by partially signed faces through Gaussian concentration with a constant $7\cdot10^9$. The second proof replaces the covering by a projection lemma with explicit parameters for a constant $156000$. The third proof turns Gaussian measure into signs by a lossless coding, with no union bound. It proves the estimate at the right radius with smooth spectral barriers and certified coefficients. It gives a constant below $7.88$. For algorithms, the main idea is to project Gaussian points onto a smoothed spectral body. The $n^{3+o(1)}$ time algorithm tracks the Gibbs matrix of that body across coordinate-descent steps with sketched increments and random refreshes.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

On Deterministically Computing Total Variation Distance via Zonotope Compression

We study deterministic relative approximation of the total variation distance between high-dimensional distributions given by succinct descriptions. We develop an abstract deterministic approximation framework based on representing the total variation distance as a support function of a low-dimensional zonotope. As applications, we obtain FPTASs for several models. Given two mixtures of product distributions over $[q]^n$ with a total of $K$ component distributions, our algorithm approximates their TV-distance within a factor of $1+\varepsilon$ in time $\widetilde O_K(nq(n/\varepsilon)^{2K})$. We also give an FPTAS for mixtures of $n$-step Markov chains over $[q]^n$ with a total of $K$ component distributions, with running time $\widetilde O_K(nq^2(n/\varepsilon)^{2K})$. Finally, for two latent-tree Ising models with the same underlying tree topology, we give an FPTAS for the TV-distance between their leaf marginals in time $O(|V|^{13}\varepsilon^{-12})$.

cs.DS↗