Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2511.17251

Basically Trapped -- A General Equilibrium Approach to the Undersupply of Basic Research in Free Markets

Abstract

In this paper I propose a micro-based innovation driven general equilibrium growth-model allowing for endogenous entry and exit as well as three different types of research. I make the novel distinction between three types of firms, namely basic and applied research where applied research is again differentiated into high and low type research to account for a heterogeneous firm environment. I further propose a new and flexible way to model basic research spillovers in this model class. While previous literature addresses the effect of R&D policies in general, my findings suggest, there is no optimal market solution in which basic research takes a noteworthy share. In order to counteract this undersupply and to take advantage of basic research spillovers, a sizable basic research subsidy is required to sufficiently crowd-in basic research which then allows for a substantial increase in welfare. My findings also suggest the necessity for purely state-financed basic research to approach the social planner solution in a feasible manner.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lucas Darius Konrad. 2025-11-21. Basically Trapped -- A General Equilibrium Approach to the Undersupply of Basic Research in Free Markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17251

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Measurement of Trustworthiness of the Online Reviews

Online review platforms shape consumer decisions, yet reported ratings and comments may be unreliable when reviewers behave inconsistently. This paper models online reviews as a sequential choice problem and proposes a formal rationality pattern function that links a reviewer's current review to their revealed preference history. Building on a two-way consistency axiom for choices from nested sets, we derive an object-specific support trajectory and an associated degree measure in [0,1] (Average Propensity to Choose a Pattern, APCP) that quantifies review trustworthiness. The measure is designed to support information updating and reduce asymmetric information by discounting reviews that are inconsistent with past behavior. A worked example illustrates how the approach assigns trustworthiness grades to reviews for different objects and how these grades can complement aggregate rating statistics. Finally, a generalized theory has been established.

econ.TH

The Depth and Reach of Exploitation: Contracting with Endogenously Naive Consumers

Consumers can invest resources to understand and avoid their behavioral mistakes, and their incentives to do so depend on the market consequences of remaining naive. We incorporate this feedback between consumers' cognitive states and market outcomes into a general contracting model. Firms face a trade-off between the depth and reach of exploitation: deeper exploitation raises profit from a naive consumer but induces greater cognitive investment, promoting sophistication and shrinking the exploitable consumer base. This trade-off disciplines exploitation and can cause policies that benefit consumers when cognition is fixed to backfire when cognition is endogenous.

econ.TH

Contracting under Misspecification

This paper studies agency problems when both parties worry that the model linking action to output is misspecified. With observable actions, an optimal contract is linear in output, so performance pay arises solely to share misspecification exposure, the slope reflects the parties' relative robustness concerns, and its allocation is Pareto efficient. With hidden actions, this sharing rule survives and incentives add a nonlinear correction. Misspecification concerns can polarize effort by making intermediate actions impossible to implement. Moreover, ambiguity across competing models has asymmetric effects: uncertainty about desired actions raises the principal's payoff, whereas uncertainty about deviations can lower it.

econ.TH