Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2511.22538

Bayesian Nonparametric Marked Hawkes Processes for Earthquake Modeling

Abstract

The Hawkes process is a versatile stochastic model for point patterns that exhibit self-excitation, that is, the property that an event occurrence increases the rate of occurrence for some period of time in the future. We present a Bayesian nonparametric modeling approach for temporal marked Hawkes processes. Our focus is on point process modeling of earthquake occurrences, where the mark variable is given by earthquake magnitude. We develop a nonparametric prior model for the marked Hawkes process excitation function, using a representation with basis components for the time lag and the mark, and basis weights defined through a gamma process prior. We elaborate the model with a nonparametric prior for time-dependent background intensity functions, thus enabling a fully nonparametric approach to modeling the ground process intensity of marked Hawkes processes. The model construction balances computationally tractable inference with flexible forms for marked Hawkes process functionals, including mark-dependent offspring densities. The posterior simulation method provides full inference, without any approximations to the Hawkes process likelihood. In the context of the application, the modeling approach enables estimation of aftershock densities that vary with the magnitude of the main shock, thus significantly expanding the inferential scope of existing self-exciting point process models for earthquake occurrences. We investigate different aspects of the methodology through study of model properties, and with inference results based on synthetic marked point patterns. The practical utility of modeling magnitude-dependent aftershock dynamics is demonstrated with analysis of earthquakes that occurred in Japan from 1885 through 1980.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hyotae Kim, Athanasios Kottas. 2025-11-27. Bayesian Nonparametric Marked Hawkes Processes for Earthquake Modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.22538

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME