Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2512.01130

Mount Rainier Elevation Survey 2024

Eric Gilbertson·Larry Signani·Kathryn Stanchak
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The elevation of Mount Rainier was last surveyed in 2010 by the Land Surveyors Association of Washington. More recent LiDAR data and observational reports have indicated that the historical highest point on the mountain, Columbia Crest, has lost a significant amount of elevation and may no longer be the highest point. This report documents the results of multiple ground surveys conducted in August and September 2024 to determine the current elevation of Columbia Crest and the current elevation and location of the summit of Mt Rainier. On August 28, 2024, a Promark 220 differential GPS unit was used to measure the elevation of Columbia Crest and the Southwest Rim, two recognized historical local maxima on the rim of the summit caldera. Columbia Crest is a year-round ice-capped locality, while the Southwest Rim melts to rock each summer. Measurements were corroborated with Abney level measurements and LiDAR data from 2007 and 2022. On September 21 and 22, 2024, additional ground measurements were taken with the Promark 220 of the Summit 2 USGS monument location and of the highest rock on the Southwest Rim. Additionally, the three USGS monuments lower on the mountain (Muir, McClure, and Paradise) were measured. These measurements were used to corroborate the summit measurements. Monument measurements were found to be consistent with 2010 measurements. Southwest Rim summit measurements were consistent from August and September. Columbia Crest, last measured at 14,411.0ft (NGVD29) in 1998, was measured to have lost 21.8ft of elevation. Now the ice-capped Columbia Crest is no longer the summit of Mt Rainier. The summit is now on the seasonally rocky Southwest Rim, next to the Summit 2 USGS monument location. (The physical monument was not located and has likely been stolen). The new summit elevation of Mount Rainier is 14,399.6ft +/-0.1ft NGVD29 (14,406.2ft +/-0.1ft NAVD88).

Explore related subjects

physics.geo-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eric Gilbertson, Larry Signani, Kathryn Stanchak. 2025-11-30. Mount Rainier Elevation Survey 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.01130

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Direction-Aware Masked Pretraining for 3D Seismic Representation Learning and Transfer to Cross-Area Acoustic Impedance Inversion

Large archives of unlabeled three-dimensional seismic data offer opportunities for self-supervised representation learning and subsequent transfer to acoustic impedance inversion. However, conventional masked pretraining often treats three axes equivalently, overlooking differences between lateral reflector structure and vertical waveform characteristics. We propose a direction-aware masked autoencoder for three-dimensional post-stack seismic data, combining anisotropic tokenization, direction-aware representation, trace-aligned tube masking, and reconstruction constraints designed for reflector continuity and waveform characteristics. We evaluate reconstruction quality and downstream transferability using field data through masked reconstruction and cross-area acoustic impedance inversion. Reconstruction is more sensitive to lateral token resolution than to moderate changes in vertical patch length. Within the evaluated configurations, increasing encoder capacity does not fully compensate for reconstruction fidelity loss associated with coarser tokenization. Preferred token scales and masking strategies differ between reconstruction and inversion, indicating that reconstruction fidelity alone is not a reliable indicator of transferability. For cross-area inversion, the pretrained model is fine-tuned in the source area and applied to the target area without further parameter updates. With limited target-area well control, the proposed framework reduces normalized root-mean-square error by 20.8% relative to a pretrained conventional masked autoencoder across eight target-area test wells under matched tokenization and downstream settings. These results demonstrate the value of direction-aware masked pretraining for field seismic inversion and show that token scale and masking strategy should be selected according to downstream-task requirements rather than reconstruction accuracy alone.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Predicting the Elastic Properties of a Cemented Granular Material during Chemical Damage (Debonding)

While underground reservoirs emerge as essential elements to face global warming, these systems represent complex multi-physical and multiscale problems. The considered injection of fluids during hydrogen storage, carbon dioxide sequestration, or geothermal energy recovery involves a modification of the chemical equilibrium of the fluid in the porous reservoir. Chemical reactions can induce microstructural changes of the rock matrix, leading to a reduction of elastic properties of the material, and to potential settlement or stress redistribution. Consequently, it becomes pivotal to establish predictive behavior laws to describe the effect of chemical damage on elastic properties. Facing the difficulties to estimate experimentally the impact of chemical damage on mechanical properties, a Digital Rock Physics approach is proposed in this contribution. This numerical homogenization scheme is used to compare two distinct types of microstructure models: the first one consists in a Discrete Element Model, while the second one employs a continuous description. This continuous formulation is based on a Phase-Field description to predict the evolution of the microstructure subjected to chemical alterations and on the Fast Fourier Transform to estimate the macroscopic properties of the material. Finally, these frameworks establish different softening laws that can be used as constitutive ingredients for a cemented material during its weathering.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Determination of Physical Height Differences from Time Transfer via the ACES Mission -- A Simulation Study

The determination of physical height differences using highly stable atomic clocks has emerged as a novel approach in relativistic geodesy, exploiting the gravitational redshift as a direct observable of geopotential differences. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of satellite-based clock comparisons using the Atomic Clock Ensemble in Space (ACES) onboard the International Space Station, which enables time transfer via microwave (MWL) and optical (ELT) links. Since operational optical data are not yet available, a comprehensive full-scale simulation of realistic ACES observation scenarios is performed, including detailed noise models of clocks and links. A slope-based estimation method is applied to time series of clock comparisons in order to extract the relativistic redshift signal and derive height differences between the ground stations. The performance of the approach is evaluated for quasi-common view, non-common view, and split non-common view configurations, where the latter divides the observation period into shorter intervals. The results show that optical links enable faster convergence and can achieve height accuracies at the decimeter level within a few days and at the centimeter level over longer periods, while microwave links are more strongly affected by noise and bias contributions. Non-common view processing significantly increases observation availability with only minor loss in accuracy, and the split approach provides robust solutions for larger networks. These findings demonstrate the strong potential of satellite-based clock comparisons as a remote-sensing technique for determining physical height differences on a continental scale.

physics.geo-ph↗