Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2512.03596

vop_poc_nz: A Python Framework for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Perspective Analysis

Abstract

Health economic evaluations are sensitive to the choice of analytical perspective (e.g., health system vs. societal). We present vop_poc_nz, a Python package for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (DCEA), Markov cohort modeling, probabilistic sensitivity analysis, value of information, and explicit comparison of analytical perspectives. We define Value of Perspective (VoP) as a directional expected opportunity loss: the welfare loss, measured under a declared reference perspective, when decisions are selected under another perspective. Five synthetic Aotearoa New Zealand demonstration models produced deterministic decision discordance in two cases at a NZ$20,000/QALY threshold. Seeded probabilistic analysis estimated mean per-person directional VoP of NZ$128,706 [$0, $279,088] for smoking cessation and NZ$30,853 [$0, $89,122] for housing insulation (95% simulation intervals in brackets); the other three cases had zero loss under the simulated strategy choices. These values test the software workflow and are not estimates for policy adoption. Release 0.2.3 supports Python 3.12-3.14 and records typed inputs, random seeds, software versions, and Arrow-schema identities for reproducible analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dylan A Mordaunt. 2026-07-21. vop_poc_nz: A Python Framework for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness and Value of Perspective Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03596

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN