Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2512.05539

Ideal Observer for Segmentation of Dead Leaves Images

Abstract

The visible parts of a scene are determined by occlusion among overlapping surfaces. Here we consider "dead leaves" models, which replicate this by independently sampling objects ("leaves") with position, shape, color, and texture and layering them until the image is covered. Building on prior theory, we present a self-contained framework that rigorously defines the dead leaves model and derives an analytical Bayesian ideal observer for partitioning finite pixel sets. The longest part of the paper spans the derivation of the prior probability, which elevates the observer beyond pixel-similarity methods by incorporating geometric information. These computations are practical only for small pixel sets (up to 9-10 pixels). We emphasize accessibility through step-by-step derivations, extensive visualizations, and examples. We empirically evaluate three tractable observers (prior-only, likelihood-only, and the full ideal observer), plus a random baseline on 108 dead leaves image datasets varying in texture intensity, leaf size, and image size. Likelihood-only performance falls with increasing texture intensity and image size. Prior-only performance falls with decreasing leaf size and increasing maximal image dimension. All model-based observers strongly outperform the random baseline, and the ideal observer consistently outperforms the others by combining both information sources. The model provides a principled upper bound on segmentation performance for limited pixel sets, enabling comparisons with human observers and algorithms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Swantje Mahncke, Malte Ott, Lars C. Reining, Thomas S. A. Wallis. 2026-09-01. Ideal Observer for Segmentation of Dead Leaves Images. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05539

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A simple derivation of the Kalman filter

In this lecture note, we present a concise and self-contained derivation of the discrete-time Kalman filter equations that requires only a basic understanding of least squares estimation. The treatment is designed to minimize mathematical overhead while preserving both rigor and generality.

math.OC

Coherent information deletion: Bayes' theorem and generalized Bayesian unlearning

Bayes' theorem admits an information-processing interpretation due to Zellner (1988): under the Shannon-information criterion, the posterior is the unique rule that processes prior and data information without information loss. We revisit these ideas, but from the perspective of information deletion. Given a posterior based on a complete dataset, what distribution should replace it when a subset of the data is removed? We define information deletion using the same information conservation principle as Zellner (1988), and show that the optimalpost-deletion distribution is exactly the leave-data-out posterior. We then extend the framework beyond likelihood-based inference from Bayes to the generalized Bayesian updating of Bissiri et al. (2016) based on loss functions. We introduce a sequential coherence requirement for deletion, under which, removing two pieces of information jointly is equivalent to removing them successively. The resulting coherent deletion rule exactly recovers the generalized Bayesian posterior based only on the retained data. Restricting these optimization problems to variational families yields corresponding formulations of variational Bayesian and generalized Bayesian unlearning.

stat.ME

A complete characterization of sequential testability and change detectability in i.i.d. models

We give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of power-one sequential tests in an i.i.d. composite testing problem. A level-\(α\) test with power one against every alternative exists if and only if the alternatives are separated from the null by a countable family of finite-block events. We provide other equivalent conditions using randomized fixed-sample tests, bounded finite-block scores, e-processes, reduced-filtration test supermartingales, and a countable cover whose finite-block weak-$*$ closed convex hulls are positively separated in total variation. As a bonus, the constructive proof yields tests have pointwise expected sample size \(O_Q(\log(1/α))\). Exactly the same conditions also characterize i.i.d.\ change detectability under optional-horizon average-run-length control: for every \(η>0\), they are equivalent to an alarm family \((T_γ)_{γ\ge1}\) satisfying \(\Prob_{P^\infty}(T_γ\leσ)\le \E_{P^\infty}σ/γ\) for every null law and every stopping time \(σ\). In fact, when these conditions hold, we can construct a single e-detector such that every null-law average run length lies between \(γ\) and \((1+η)γ+1\), and having robust Lorden delay \(O_Q(\logγ)\).

math.ST