Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2512.06056

Diophantine Analysis of a Digital Anomaly

Abstract

The arithmetic-digital anomaly of $5÷2 = 2.5$ has been observed several times in the past. We generalize it to an exponential Diophantine equation and inequality in the general number base, which is the object of our analysis. First, we produce a near-parametrization of all solutions using a modification of the standard parametrization of Pythagorean triples. We use this parametrized function to find all solutions where the numerator and denominator are coprime, and we construct infinite families where they are not coprime. Next, we use a variant of Baker's theorem from transcendental number theory to prove that each number base admits only finitely many solutions. Lastly, we use the $abc$ conjecture to conditionally show that only finitely many solutions have a numerator with $k$ digits, for each $k\ge 3$. A conjecture is offered for $k=2$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Samer Seraj. 2025-12-05. Diophantine Analysis of a Digital Anomaly. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06056

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO