Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2512.07024

Wage Dispersion, On-the-Job Search, and Stochastic Match Productivity: A Mean Field Game Approach

Abstract

Wage dispersion and job-to-job mobility are central features of modern labour markets, yet canonical equilibrium search models with exogenous job-offer ladders struggle to jointly account for these facts and the magnitude of frictional wage inequality. We develop a continuous-time equilibrium search model in which match surplus follows a diffusion process, workers choose on-the-job search and separation, firms post state-contingent wages, and the cross-sectional distribution of match states endogenously determines both outside options and the job ladder. On the theoretical side, we formulate the problem as a stationary mean field game with a one-dimensional surplus state, characterize stationary mean field equilibria, and show that equilibrium separation is governed by a free-boundary rule: matches continue if and only if surplus stays above an endogenous threshold. Under standard regularity and Lasry-Lions monotonicity conditions we prove existence and uniqueness of stationary equilibrium and obtain comparative statics for the separation boundary, wage schedules, and wage dispersion. On the quantitative side, we solve the coupled HJB and Kolmogorov system using monotone finite-difference methods and interpret the discretization as a finite-state mean field game. The model is calibrated to micro evidence on stochastic match productivity, job durations, tenure-dependent separation hazards, wage growth, and job-to-job mobility. The stationary equilibrium delivers a structural decomposition of wage dispersion into stochastic selection along job spells, equilibrium on-the-job search and the induced job ladder, and equilibrium wage policies with feedback through outside options. We use this framework to quantify how firing costs, search subsidies, and changes in match-productivity volatility jointly shape mobility, the job ladder, and the cross-sectional distribution of wages.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I. Sebastian Buhai. 2025-12-07. Wage Dispersion, On-the-Job Search, and Stochastic Match Productivity: A Mean Field Game Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Log-concave functions and transformations thereof

I summarize Bagnoli and Bergstrom (2005)'s review on log-concave functions, make several corrections, and augment the discussion with further results that can be useful in establishing monotone hazard rates. I also provide an application to monopoly pricing, where log-concavity of the demand curve implies strict concavity of the revenue function in quantity.

econ.TH

Audit the Auditors: Commitment versus Professional Judgment

This paper provides a theoretical framework to evaluate the trade-off between the self-regulated peer review system and independent government inspection (PCAOB) in the auditing profession. We model the peer review system as a Judgment Regime, where a stakeholder utilizes professional expertise, captured as a private signal, to make ex-post decisions on verifying audit failures. In contrast, PCAOB inspection is modeled as a Commitment Regime, where the stakeholder lacks private information but can commit ex-ante to a predetermined level of verification. We find that the Judgment Regime benefits from a resource-allocation effect and a deterrence effect driven by informed verification, whereas the Commitment Regime deters audit failures through the first-mover advantage of ex-ante commitment. Our analysis demonstrates that the stakeholder prefers the peer review system if and only if the private signal is sufficiently informative. Furthermore, comparative statics reveal that higher verification costs or stronger audit incentives shift the stakeholder's preference toward PCAOB inspection.

econ.TH

Reputation, Disclosure, and the Scope of Entry

This paper studies how learning about an incumbent affects the scope of entry when competitive responses use resources shared across markets. An entrant chooses whether to launch in neither, one, or both of two markets. Entry into the second market reduces the incumbent's cost-reducing response in the first and can make one-market entry unattractive. The entrant learns about the incumbent's capability from a record of its response to an earlier rival. More frequent publication encourages a less capable incumbent to imitate a more capable one. An observed response then becomes less informative, and entry after that record expands. We compare publication of conduct with a public audit of capability. For an open set of parameters with uniform setup costs, full publication maximizes total surplus within the specified policy class when publication costs are low. Removing the interaction between response costs across markets reverses this choice, while preserving all early and singleton-market payoffs. A capability audit is dominated in both economies. Expected entry scope is constant across the considered policies within each technology, although productive investment and the allocation of entry change.

econ.TH