Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2512.11649

Unified Approach to Portfolio Optimization using the `Gain Probability Density Function' and Applications

Abstract

This article proposes a unified framework for portfolio optimization (PO), recognizing an object called the `gain probability density function (PDF)' as the fundamental object of the problem from which any objective function could be derived. The gain PDF has the advantage of being 1-dimensional for any given portfolio and thus is easy to visualize and interpret. The framework allows us to naturally incorporate all existing approaches (Markowitz, CVaR-deviation, higher moments...) and represents an interesting basis to develop new approaches. It leads us to propose a method to directly match a target PDF defined by the portfolio manager, giving them maximal control on the PO problem and moving beyond approaches that focus only on expected return and risk. As an example, we develop an application involving a new objective function to control high profits, to be applied after a conventional PO (including expected return and risk criteria) and thus leading to sub-optimality w.r.t. the conventional objective function. We then propose a methodology to quantify a cost associated with this optimality deviation in a common budget unit, providing a meaningful information to portfolio managers. Numerical experiments considering portfolios with energy-producing assets illustrate our approach. The framework is flexible and can be applied to other sectors (financial assets, etc).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jean-Patrick Mascomère, Jérémie Messud, Yagnik Chatterjee, Isabel Barros Garcia. 2025-12-12. Unified Approach to Portfolio Optimization using the `Gain Probability Density Function' and Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.11649

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM