The SIREN Program: A Scalable Model for Short-Term Undergraduate Research Experiences at Community Colleges

Emilie Hein; Polin Yadak; Denise Hum; Jessica Hurless; Luis Jibaja Prado; Susanne Schubert; Pia Walawalkar; Marco Wehrfritz; Daria Baitazarova; Yuting Duan; Tin Htoo; Codie Lai; Aryanna Mendoza; Eslin Villalta; Valeria Zarco

arXiv · 2512.13050

The SIREN Program: A Scalable Model for Short-Term Undergraduate Research Experiences at Community Colleges

Emilie Hein·Polin Yadak·Denise Hum·Jessica Hurless·Luis Jibaja Prado·Susanne Schubert·Pia Walawalkar·Marco Wehrfritz·Daria Baitazarova·Yuting Duan·Tin Htoo·Codie Lai·Aryanna Mendoza·Eslin Villalta·Valeria Zarco

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Providing meaningful research experiences for undergraduate students is a well-recognized challenge, particularly at community colleges and teaching-focused institutions where resources are limited and faculty time is dedicated to instruction. To address this, the Summer Introduction to Research and Experimentation in Nuclear physics (SIREN) was developed as a three-week, intensive summer program that engaged 24 students working in six teams on original research projects centered around cosmic detection. Each team was supported by an advisor and a peer mentor, combining structured guidance with near-peer learning. After developing a range of technical skills, students built cosmic detectors and used them to explore a variety of projects. The program also included multiple workshops on research skills and seminars led by guest speakers, giving students access to broader STEM pathways. The evaluation of the program was based on advisor and student surveys, as well as peer mentor observations. The findings suggest that the short-term team-based model promoted engagement, collaboration, and skill development while leading to the completion of advanced projects. The advisors highlighted the effectiveness of the program structure and the excitement generated by the direct application of newly acquired skills to research. Data showed that students were able to significantly develop transferable skills through hands-on activities. Post-program surveys indicated that participants experienced an increased sense of belonging in their majors and greater confidence in pursuing careers in STEM.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Emilie Hein, Polin Yadak, Denise Hum, Jessica Hurless, Luis Jibaja Prado, Susanne Schubert, Pia Walawalkar, Marco Wehrfritz, Daria Baitazarova, Yuting Duan, Tin Htoo, Codie Lai, Aryanna Mendoza, Eslin Villalta, Valeria Zarco. 2025-12-15. The SIREN Program: A Scalable Model for Short-Term Undergraduate Research Experiences at Community Colleges. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.13050

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph↗

arXiv2026

A Workshop Series for Effective Use of AI in Uncertain Times: Building a Physics Faculty Learning Community

Generative AI tools are being widely taken up by students in their physics courses and beyond, often before instructors and institutions can develop policies and effective approaches for the use of these tools. Building on a framework for change in the era of AI, we developed and implemented a faculty learning community to help a university physics department address these challenges collectively. Over six biweekly sessions, faculty worked through course policies, classroom conversations about AI, AI-integrated coursework tasks, and assessment. Each session shared a common structure: we presented local data and department-sourced materials, tested them in small groups, and discussed them together, emphasizing durable pedagogical approaches over specific tools and platforms, and leading with evidence of students' own AI use. The series produced a shared, evolving repository of resources for faculty to draw on. This workshop provides an adaptable, theoretically informed model for a faculty learning community that departments can build on.

physics.ed-ph↗