Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2601.05497

Tree versus tree of preorder induced by rainbow forbidden subgraphs

Abstract

A subgraph $H$ of an edge-colored graph $G$ is rainbow if all the edges of $H$ receive different colors. If $G$ does not contain a rainbow subgraph isomorphic to $H$, we say that $G$ is rainbow $H$-free. For connected graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$, if there exists an integer $t=t(H_1,H_2)$ such that every rainbow $H_1$-free edge-colored complete graph colored with $t$ or more colors is rainbow $H_2$-free, then we write $H_1\le H_2$. The binary relation $\le$ is reflexive and transitive, and hence it is a preorder. For graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$, we write $H_1 \equiv H_2$ if both $H_1 \le H_2$ and $H_2 \le H_1$ hold. Then $\equiv$ is an equivalence relation. If $H_1$ is a subgraph of $H_2$, then trivially $H_1\le H_2$ holds. On the other hand, there exists a pair $(H_1, H_2)$ such that $H_1$ is a proper supergraph of $H_2$ and $H_1\le H_2$ holds. Q.~Cui, Q.~Liu, C.~Magnant and A.~Saito [Discrete Math. {\bf 344} (2021) Article Number 112267] characterized these pairs. %On the other hand, there are few known results regarding the study of $\leq$ for the incomparable with respect to $\subseteq$. Cui et al. found pairs of graphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ such that $H_1 \leq H_2$ and $H_2 \leq H_1$, that is, non-singleton equivalence class with respect to $\le$. However, we have not found any other non-singleton equivalence class with respect to $\le$ except for those discovered by Cui et al. In this paper. we investigate the existence of non-singleton equivalence class with respect to $\le$ by focusing on trees.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shun-ichi Maezawa. 2026-09-05. Tree versus tree of preorder induced by rainbow forbidden subgraphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.05497

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO