Testing three models of cognitive stress effects: A psychopharmacological randomized controlled trial of acute stress and stress hormones across visual perception, response inhibition and cognitive flexibility

Lisa Weckesser; Charlotte Grosskopf; Benjamin Weber; Selen Soylu; Tanja Endrass; Robert Miller

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.10515

Testing three models of cognitive stress effects: A psychopharmacological randomized controlled trial of acute stress and stress hormones across visual perception, response inhibition and cognitive flexibility

Lisa Weckesser·Charlotte Grosskopf·Benjamin Weber·Selen Soylu·Tanja Endrass·Robert Miller

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Acute stress alters cognitive performance, yet competing models make divergent predictions regarding the mechanisms, scope, and temporal dynamics of these effects. This large-scale randomized controlled trial tested predications from three influential stress-effect models using a broad cognitive task battery embedded within a psychopharmacological stress paradigm. Across 606 testing sessions, 303 healthy male participants completed both the Maastricht Acute Stress Test (MAST) and its non-stress control condition. To independently manipulate acute stress and stress hormone availability, participants were additionally randomized to receive atomoxetine (40 mg; to prolong norepinephrine availability), hydrocortisone (10 mg; to increase cortisol availability), or placebo. Cognitive performance was assessed over 80-minutes (post-stress) using tasks targeting visual perception (rapid serial visual presentation), response inhibition (stop-signal), and cognitive flexibility (dual and switch tasks). MAST exposure selectively impaired response inhibition, reflected in shorter stop-signal delays, lower probabilities of successful stopping and prolonged stop-signal reaction times, particularly during later testing phases (40-80 minutes post-stress). MAST exposure did not affect visual perception or task-switching performance but buffered time-related declines in processing efficiency at the expense of task prioritization in the dual task. Pharmacological manipulation of norepinephrine or cortisol availability was effective but did not moderate cognitive stress effects. Overall, this pattern of task-specific impairment alongside stabilized processing efficiency cannot be fully explained by any tested model, highlighting the need to refine existing models and adopt more integrative approaches to advance our mechanistic understanding of cognitive stress-effects in laboratory and real-world contexts.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.NC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Lisa Weckesser, Charlotte Grosskopf, Benjamin Weber, Selen Soylu, Tanja Endrass, Robert Miller. 2026-01-15. Testing three models of cognitive stress effects: A psychopharmacological randomized controlled trial of acute stress and stress hormones across visual perception, response inhibition and cognitive flexibility. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10515

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Identifying Neural State Changes due to Gain versus Off-Manifold Displacement

Memory segmentation is thought to arise from rapid decorrelation in neural activity, often quantified by Euclidean distance or cosine angle. Although these metrics detect a transition, they do not reveal how the new state relates to the repertoire represented by the neural manifold. This matters because neuromodulators that drive state transitions also alter excitability, and learning may repurpose existing representations or create new ones. Here, I introduce a geometric decomposition that separates changes attributable to gain modulation of a nearby manifold state from movement within the manifold and genuine off-manifold displacement. The approach uses the radial axis of neural population activity to partition the normal space of a local manifold region. A central challenge is identifiability: given only a static reference manifold and a single test state, neither the state from which a perturbation began nor its gain magnitude and mechanistic decomposition can generally be recovered uniquely. I therefore formulate identifiability as a cascade of geometric gates specifying when each component can be interpreted. The gates distinguish structural failures, including the absence of a local chart or incorrect intrinsic dimensionality, from estimation error and systematic bias caused by reference sampling, tangent-frame error, gain-axis misalignment, anchor displacement, and poor ratio conditioning. Simulations show that neighborhood size, curvature, sampling density, ambient dimension, and noise act through a small set of geometric quantities. The framework specifies when assignments to gain or novelty are identifiable, how they become biased, and which diagnostics reveal the relevant failure regime. By quantifying the nature rather than only the magnitude of neural state change, it provides a clear, readily interpretable framework for evaluating mechanisms of neural state transitions.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

Neural Langevin Machine: a local asymmetric learning rule can be creative

Fixed points of recurrent neural networks can be leveraged to store and generate information. These fixed points are captured by the Boltzmann-Gibbs measure, which leads to neural Langevin dynamics that relax to those fixed points for generative learning of a real dataset. We call this type of generative model a neural Langevin machine, which derives an asymmetric and firing-rate-speed-adjusted learning rule requiring only local neural signals, thereby bearing biological relevance in terms of local predictive learning. An out-of-equilibrium regime of the generative process is revealed, together with a memorization-to-generalization transition with increasing training data size. The neuro-inspired machine can also realize a continuous exploration of the phase space for different kinds of generative images and can denoise a corrupted image as well.

q-bio.NC↗

arXiv2026

A Mathematical Model of Motivated Emotional Mind - Cognitive Embodied System

This article presents a mathematical model of the Motivated Emotional Mind cognitive architecture developed for embodied intelligent systems. Such a system learns to maintain its homeostasis through a generalized form of reinforcement learning based on its internal motivations, termed motivated learning (ML). The principal contribution of this article is a rigorous formalization of the re-entrant loop integrating feedforward processing, lateral interactions, and feedback pathways, together with the representational selection mechanisms that govern adaptive system responses. The model specifies how ongoing exteroceptive and interoceptive signals, bodily-motivational context, and memory traces are bound into associative memory structures termed semblions, which compete for access to further processing and top-down reconstruction. The formalization encompasses secondary perception, representational competition, curiosity, procedural gaps, and action selection directed toward limiting allostatic violations. Within this framework, motivated learning is tailored to embodied systems whose dynamics are shaped by needs, affect, and the current regulatory state. Unlike standard reinforcement-learning models, the proposed approach incorporates need thresholds, goal generation and shifting goals, bodily state, resource constraints, and action uncertainty, thereby providing a more adequate account of response selection under regulatory pressure. Global affect functions as a central control signal, modulating the learning rate, representational valence, and the balance between exploration and exploitation. The model presented here is a step toward a more rigorous formalization of cognitive phenomena and may provide a basis for further theoretical analysis, computer simulation, and implementation in artificial-intelligence systems inspired by biological processes.

q-bio.NC↗