Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2601.12541

Admissible Information Structures, Immersion, and the Order of Non-Anticipative Aggregation

Abstract

This version corrects and supersedes an earlier preprint (arXiv:2601.12541) whose central impossibility theorem was incorrect; the nature of the error and its correction are stated explicitly in Section 1.1. We retain the parts that are valid - the local reduction of pricing to the natural price filtration and its stability properties - and we replace the erroneous global non-existence claim with the statement that is actually true. Two facts are established. First, when the information structure is treated as an admissible (immersion-preserving) enlargement, local martingale pricing reduces to the natural price filtration, and this reduction is stable under restriction and under aggregation when a common pricing measure exists. Second, non-anticipativity of information does not aggregate: there exist signals, each individually and pairwise non-anticipative with respect to the reference Brownian filtration, whose joint observation reveals a function of a future increment; the failure first occurs at order three and is invisible to every lower-order test. We show that this aggregation failure requires dependence among the signals (a masking relation), not independence, and that it is an obstruction at the level of information admissibility (immersion), not at the level of no-arbitrage: the enlarged market continues to admit a local martingale deflator. We situate the results relative to the filtration-reduction program of Grigorian and Jarrow and relate the admissibility notion to predictive (Granger) and interventionist (Pearl) causality.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez. 2026-06-22. Admissible Information Structures, Immersion, and the Order of Non-Anticipative Aggregation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12541

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Affine Pricing Models from Group Quantization and Holonomy

The analytic tractability of affine pricing models is usually expressed through two complementary formulations: a coordinate-space pricing operator and an exponential-affine transform representation governed by generalized Riccati equations. We develop \emph{Affine Holonomy Group Quantization} (AHGQ) as a geometric framework in which these two formulations arise from the same underlying structure. The construction separates the affine pricing symbol into a homogeneous quadratic sector and a complementary affine sector. The first generates a finite-dimensional symplectic transport and a centrally extended Lie group, while the second is represented by a multiplicative holonomy carried by a thin-path groupoid. Their combination determines an affine Poincaré--Cartan form. Its characteristic dynamics reduce in momentum variables to the generalized Riccati system and its scalar amplitude, whereas the coordinate representation recovers the standard affine pricing operator. Representative Gaussian and square-root models illustrate the construction. The contribution is structural: AHGQ gives a common geometric origin to the coordinate and transform representations of continuous-path, time-homogeneous affine pricing models.

q-fin.MF↗

Asset price bubbles under model uncertainty and short-sale constraints: A discrete-time analysis

In this study, we investigate asset price bubbles in a discrete-time, discrete-state market under model uncertainty and short-sale constraints. Using a super-hedging valuation benchmark, we study the difference between the asset's market price and its fundamental value in this constrained market. We examine how assumptions on the liquidation time affect the conditional expectation bounds satisfied by the resulting bubble process. For assets with bounded maturity and no dividend payments, the G-supermartingale property of prices provides a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of bubbles. In contrast, when maturity is unbounded, the infi-supermartingale property yields a necessary condition, while the G-supermartingale property remains sufficient. We also show that no dominance rules out bubbles when the liquidation time is bounded. For finite-horizon contingent claims, we distinguish upper-valuation relations from no-dominance benchmarks. Fundamental prices satisfy put-call bounds, whereas market prices satisfy put-call parity under no dominance. In the dividend-free setting, the same assumptions imply equality between American and European call fundamental values and, under the stated trading conditions, between their market prices.

q-fin.MF↗

Optimal investment under capital gains taxes

We generalize classical existence results for expected utility maximization in discrete time frictionless market models to models with capital gains taxes. We consider the realistic but mathematically challenging rule that losses do not trigger negative taxes but can only be offset against potential gains in the future. Central to the analysis is a well-known phenomenon from arbitrage-free markets with proportional transaction costs that does not exist in arbitrage-free frictionless markets: an investment in specific quantities of stocks that is completely riskless but may provide an advantage over holding money in the bank account. As a result of this phenomenon, on an infinite probability space, no-arbitrage does not imply that the set of attainable terminal wealth is closed in probability. We provide simple sufficient conditions for closedness. Then, we characterize the closure of the set of attainable terminal wealth, thereby identifying precisely the source of non-closedness. As a by-product, we obtain a new construction for an integrable majorant that dominates the utilities of all nonnegative terminal wealth attainable from a given initial capital in a frictionless market and that works directly in multiperiod models.

q-fin.MF↗