How to Verify a Turing Machine with Dafny

Edgar F. A. Lederer

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2601.15230

How to Verify a Turing Machine with Dafny

Edgar F. A. Lederer

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper describes the formal verification of two Turing machines using the program verifier Dafny. Both machines are deciders, so we prove total correctness. They are typical first examples of Turing machines used in any course of Theoretical Computer Science; in fact, the second machine is literally taken from a relevant textbook. Usually, the correctness of such machines is made plausible by some informal explanations of their basic ideas, augmented with a few sample executions, but neither by rigorous mathematical nor mechanized formal proof. No wonder: The invariants (and variants) required for such proofs are big artifacts, peppered with overpowering technical details. Finding and checking these artifacts without mechanical support is practically impossible, and such support is only available since recent times. But nowadays, just because of these technicalities, with such subjects under proof a program verifier can really show off and demonstrate its capabilities.

Explore related subjects

cs.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Edgar F. A. Lederer. 2026-01-21. How to Verify a Turing Machine with Dafny. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.15230

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO↗