Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2601.18854

Learning constitutive laws under explicit strain limits: An interpretable strain-limiting elasticity--Kolmogorov Arnold neural network framework

Abstract

A physically consistent framework for modeling materials with saturating deformation, such as elastomers and biological tissues, is provided by strain-limiting elasticity. Fundamental limitations of classical elasticity are addressed through the enforcement of bounded strains; however, significant challenges for data-driven learning are posed by the strong nonlinearity of these laws. In this work, an interpretable hybrid constitutive modeling framework integrating strain-limiting elasticity (SLE) with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) is proposed to balance mechanical admissibility with data-driven flexibility. The dominant nonlinear response is captured by the SLE backbone, while smooth residual corrections are learned exclusively via a KAN. Essential mechanical principles-including symmetry, monotonicity, and bounded strain-are embedded directly into the model structure to ensure physical admissibility. The framework is assessed on synthetic benchmarks, where near-exact recovery is achieved in smooth regimes and consistency is retained under sharp transitions. Application to Treloar's rubber elasticity data demonstrates systematic improvement in stress-stretch agreement while preserving explicit strain limits. A regime-based analysis reveals a transparent trade-off between data fidelity and mechanical admissibility, demonstrating that deviations arise from deliberately imposed physical restrictions rather than unconstrained model expressivity. This SLE-KAN framework offers a robust, physics-consistent alternative to black-box neural networks for constitutive modeling.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Chandana Pati, S. M. Mallikarjunaiah. 2026-01-26. Learning constitutive laws under explicit strain limits: An interpretable strain-limiting elasticity--Kolmogorov Arnold neural network framework. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18854

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Proof of Liu's Conjecture on the Fundamental Triangle Inequality

Let $a,b,c$ be the side lengths of a triangle, and let $R$ and $r$ denote its circumradius and inradius, respectively. Liu proposed the conjecture \[ \sum_{\text{cyc}} \left(\frac{a(b+c-a)}{bc}\right)^k \ge 2+\left(\frac{2r}{R}\right)^k,\qquad k>1, \] with the reverse inequality for $k<1$. We prove this conjecture by reducing it to an algebraic inequality for three positive variables with prescribed sum and product. We also determine the equality cases.

math.GM

A quadratic critical-value conjecture for the fifth Bessel moment

We conjecture an explicit evaluation of the pure fifth Bessel moment $\int_0^\infty K_0(t)^5\,dt$ as a quadratic expression in the critical value $L(f,2)$ of the weight-three, level-60 newform $f$ (LMFDB orbit 60.3.b.a) identified in the twisted fifth-moment modularity theorem of Lim, Tu and Yu, with coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$ and the square taken before the real and imaginary parts. Directed interval computations, using no stored Bessel or $L$-values, bound the absolute discrepancy by $10^{-358}$. We prove three exact modular identities for $f$: the Petersson-norm formula $\langle f,f\rangle_{60} = \frac{3(5-\sqrt{5})}{2π^4}|L(f,2)|^2$, the coefficient-conjugation relation $L(f^σ,2) = κL(f,2)$ with explicit $κ\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5},i)$, and the twisted symmetric-square evaluation $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2) = \sqrt{15}\,π^2 \langle f,f\rangle_{60}$, together with $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,3) = π^4\langle f,f\rangle_{60}/8$, in the full Euler-factor normalization of Lim, Tu and Yu. The last identity shows that the companion norm conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = \frac{3\sqrt{15}(5-\sqrt{5})}{2}|L(f,2)|^2$ is equivalent to the symmetric-square conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = π^2 L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2)$ of Lim, Tu and Yu, while the exact relation $D_{5,\mathrm{even}} = π^2 D_{5,\mathrm{odd}}/(2\sqrt{15})$ follows from Chuang's period formulas. Every Bessel-to-modular equality, including the individual-period formula, remains conjectural. Complete proofs, exact rational certificates and verification programs are included as ancillary files.

math.GM