Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2602.08420

Johann Heinrich Lambert's memoir "Theorie der Parallellinien": A review with commentary

Abstract

We review the memoir \emph{heorie der Parallellinien} by Johann Heinrich Lambert, written in 1766. Lambert, a victim of the prejudices of his time, conceived this memoir as an attempt to prove the so-called parallel postulate of Euclid's \emph{Elements}, and consequently, the non-existence of the geometry that we now call hyperbolic geometry. In fact, by developing the foundations of a geometry obtained by replacing the parallel postulate with its negation while keeping Euclid's other postulates unchanged, Lambert was hoping to arrive at a contradiction. Of course, he failed in his endeavor, but these attempts at proving the parallel postulate implicitly contain, without Lambert having foreseen it, fundamental results of hyperbolic geometry, the discovery of which, by Lobachevsky, Bolyai and Gauss, was not to take place until the following century. Thus, Lambert's memoir (which he did not intend to publish but which was eventually published in 1895) constitutes one of the founding texts of non-Euclidean geometry. Spherical geometry is one of the three geometries of constant curvature, the other two being Euclidean geometry and hyperbolic geometry. In this sense, along with hyperbolic geometry, spherical geometry constitutes one of the two non-Euclidean geometries. In fact, Lambert, like Lobachevsky and others after him, understood the deep relationships between the three geometries: Euclidean, spherical, and hyperbolic, in particular the formal and the more profound analogies between the trigonometric formulae, the properties of birectangular isosceles quadrilaterals and of trirectangular quadrilaterals, the monotonicity properties (which can be formulated in terms of convexity properties) which hold in opposite senses in spherical and hyperbolic geometry which at some points he calls a sphere of imaginary radius. It is for these reasons that we decided to include in this volume, dedicated to spherical geometry, a chapter on this important memoir by Lambert, trying to highlight its most important ideas. This paper will appear as a chapter in the book ``Spherical Geometry in the Eighteenth Century I: Euler, Lagrange and Lambert'', ed. R. Caddeo and A. Papadopoulos, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Athanase Papadopoulos, Guillaume Théret. 2026-03-30. Johann Heinrich Lambert's memoir "Theorie der Parallellinien": A review with commentary. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08420

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On the Reconstruction of SAS from Other Triangle Congruence Criteria, Part II: Eliminating the Pons Asinorum

In the first part of this work we showed that, within a Hilbert plane deprived of the Side-Angle-Side axiom, the Side-Angle-Angle criterion, together with a ray correspondence principle [\textbf{RCT}], the existence of angle bisectors [\textbf{AB}], the congruence of supplements of congruent angles [\textbf{SA}], and the Pons Asinorum [\textbf{PA}], suffices to reconstruct SAS. We left open the question of whether [\textbf{PA}] is genuinely required alongside the other three principles, noting only a qualitative asymmetry in the nature of the principles involved. In this second part we answer this question: we show that \begin{equation*} \textrm{SAA},\ [\textbf{RCT}],\ [\textbf{AB}] \;\vdash\; [\textbf{PA}], \end{equation*} so that [\textbf{PA}] is redundant among the hypotheses of our main theorem, which improves to \begin{equation*} \textrm{SAA},\ [\textbf{RCT}],\ [\textbf{AB}],\ [\textbf{SA}] \;\vdash\; \textrm{SAS}. \end{equation*} The proof adapts an argument recently given by Donnelly, who reconstructs SAS from SAA together with an angle addition axiom and the existence of angle bisectors.

math.HO

Chebyshev and garment cutting. Debunking some myths

In {\tt 1878}, Pafnuty Chebyshev presented to the {\it Association fran\c caise pour l'avan\-cement des sciences} {\it [French Association for the Advancement of the Sciences]} an article \cite{Chebyshev1878} dealing with garment cutting. According to Chebyshev himself, his interest was sparked by a lecture given by Édouard Lucas that he had attended in {\tt 1876} \cite{Lucas1876}. There is a second story on the origin of Chebyshev's interest in garment cutting according to which in the 1850s, being short of money, Chebyshev got himself a job as a consultant to a clothing factory. At the time of the Crimean War (1853-1856), there was a great demand for uniforms. Chebyshev was allegedly asked to optimize the use of fabric, and it was there that his interest in garment cutting was born. This second story appears to have its origin in a post by Clive J. Grant to MacTutor in 1996 \cite{Grant1996}. However, this contribution contains no references, and no other source of information that I have found offers any first-hand documentation to support this story. Our conclusion is that this second story is a fabrication, invented out of whole cloth.

math.HO

Mathematics Graduate Training in the Age of AI

Generative AI changes the conditions under which graduate mathematics is learned, assessed, written, and defended. The central claim of this paper is that mathematics graduate programs should respond to the moment by clarifying what graduate mathematics education is trying to teach and assess. In most ways, the goals of mathematics education have not changed. Rather, with changing tools it has become more essential than ever to make clear the goals of mathematical training. We use the term mathematical judgment to refer to the capacity to evaluate mathematics (e.g., claims, definitions, examples, proofs, analogies, computations, uses of tools, research directions) as mathematically sound, useful, well-posed, and appropriately justified. The recommendation is to center training on mathematical judgment, and we examine possible policies for graduate programs in Mathematics to this end.

math.HO