Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.11250

An Improved Upper Bound for the Euclidean TSP Constant Using Band Crossovers

Julia Gaudio·Charlie K. Guan
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Consider $n$ points generated uniformly at random in the unit square, and let $L_n$ be the length of their optimal traveling salesman tour. Beardwood, Halton, and Hammersley (1959) showed $L_n / \sqrt n \to β$ almost surely as $n\to \infty$ for some constant $β$. The exact value of $β$ is unknown but estimated to be approximately $0.71$ (Applegate, Bixby, Chvátal, Cook 2011). Beardwood et al. further showed that $0.625 \leq β\leq 0.92116.$ Currently, the best known bounds are $0.6277 \leq β\leq 0.90380$, due to Gaudio and Jaillet (2019) and Carlsson and Yu (2023), respectively. The upper bound was derived using a computer-aided approach that is amenable to lower bounds with improved computation speed. In this paper, we show via simulation and concentration analysis that future improvement of the $0.90380$ is limited to $\sim0.88$. Moreover, we provide an alternative tour-constructing heuristic that, via simulation, could potentially improve the upper bound to $\sim0.85$. Our approach builds on a prior \emph{band-traversal} strategy, initially proposed by Beardwood et al. (1959) and subsequently refined by Carlsson and Yu (2023): divide the unit square into bands of height $Θ(1/\sqrt{n})$, construct paths within each band, and then connect the paths to create a TSP tour. Our approach allows paths to cross bands, and takes advantage of pairs of points in adjacent bands which are close to each other. A rigorous numerical analysis improves the upper bound to $0.90367$.

Explore related subjects

cs.CGcs.DSmath.COmath.PR

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Julia Gaudio, Charlie K. Guan. 2026-02-11. An Improved Upper Bound for the Euclidean TSP Constant Using Band Crossovers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11250

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A constant-factor approximation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance in the plane

We give the first polynomial-time constant-factor approximation of the Gromov-Hausdorff distance d_GH between finite point sets in the Euclidean plane; in fixed Euclidean dimension such an approximation was previously known only on the line (Majhi, Vitter and Wenk, 2024). Global alignment cannot succeed: the classical dimension drop defeats alignment by isometries, a multiplicity gap defeats alignment by bijections, and a reflection barrier defeats sorting under any single global reflection pattern. The algorithm is therefore local. Guessing the images of one diameter pair pins every point's longitudinal coordinate to within O(d_GH). Heights are read in windows whose height spread is at most a fixed multiple of their length, where a chain argument makes every compatible match local in the plane. One reflection sign per window is then chosen by 2-SAT; at the right frame and guess, any solution yields a correspondence of distortion O(d_GH). For the bijective relative of d_GH, half the least additive distortion over bijections, the same scheme reduces the planar problem to a matching question that we leave open.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Witness Set in Weak Visibility Polygons is Polynomial-Time Solvable

In the classical Art Gallery Problem (AGP), guards are placed in a polygon so that together they see every point. The Witness Set Problem (WSP), introduced by Amit, Mitchell, and Packer, is a natural dual to the AGP. In this paper, we study the WSP in weak visibility polygons (WVPs), the simple polygons in which every point is seen from some point of one fixed edge. A witness set is a set of points whose visibility regions are pairwise disjoint, so that no single guard sees two of them. A maximum witness set, therefore, lower-bounds the guard number. Exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP are known only for monotone mountains, a proper subclass of WVPs. We give the first exact polynomial-time algorithms for the WSP in WVPs, in two settings. In the Discrete Witness Set Problem (DiscWSP), the witnesses come from a given set of $m$ points, and we find a maximum witness subset in $O(n + m \log(n+m))$ time on an $n$-vertex polygon. The algorithm rests on a structural fact: the visibility intersection graph of a WVP, in which two points are adjacent if their visibility regions intersect, is a trapezoid graph, that is, an intersection graph of trapezoids between two parallel lines. Moreover, the class of these graphs properly contains the interval graphs and the permutation graphs, which may be of independent interest in graph theory. We also prove an $Ω(n \log n)$ lower bound in the algebraic decision-tree model for instances with $m = Θ(n)$, so our algorithm for DiscWSP is optimum. In the Continuous Witness Set Problem (ContWSP), a witness may be any point of the polygon, and we give an exact algorithm running in $O(n \log n + ρ^{2}(n + ρ^{2}))$ time, where $ρ$ is the number of reflex vertices.

cs.CG↗
arXiv2026

Bichromatic Line-Centers for Point Pairs

We study the \emph{bichromatic line-center problem} for $n$ pairs of points in the plane. A feasible solution assigns one point from each pair to the red set $R$ and the other to the blue set $B$. The goal is to minimize $\max\{w^\circ(R),\,w^\circ(B)\}$, where $w^\circ(X)$ denotes the minimum width of a strip enclosing $X$; the midlines of the corresponding optimal strips define the line-centers of $R$ and $B$. We consider several variants induced by orientational constraints on line-centers and provide efficient algorithms for each. For one line-center, which consists of computing a minimum-width strip that contains at least one point from each pair, we give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm. For two line-centers, we obtain an $O(n)$-time algorithm when both are horizontal, and $Θ(n\log n)$-time algorithms when the two centers are parallel or when both orientations are prescribed. When exactly one orientation is prescribed, we give an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm. Finally, for the unrestricted case, we present an $O(n^3\log n)$-time algorithm.

cs.CG↗