Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2602.11831

Measuring individual contributions to team success in professional road cycling

Abstract

Assessing individual contributions within teams remains a fundamental challenge. This issue is particularly important in professional road cycling, where personal success hinges on a combination of individual talent and collective effort. Current points-based rankings disproportionately reward team leaders, undervaluing those who contribute through collaborative roles. To address this issue, we propose a flexible framework for collaborative contribution within professional cycling teams that combines individual performance, race participation, and a team-based credit-allocation system. Using data from the 2023 season, we show that our framework identifies meaningful differences in rider contribution that existing ranking systems fail to capture. We then select a parameter configuration for our framework that closely aligns with rider assessments from Pro Cycling Manager, assigning equal weights to individual performance, race participation, and collaborative contribution. Finally, we use this configuration to examine which rider characteristics are associated with gains or losses under collaborative evaluation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aitor Calo-Blanco. 2026-09-04. Measuring individual contributions to team success in professional road cycling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11831

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Log-concave functions and transformations thereof

I summarize Bagnoli and Bergstrom (2005)'s review on log-concave functions, make several corrections, and augment the discussion with further results that can be useful in establishing monotone hazard rates. I also provide an application to monopoly pricing, where log-concavity of the demand curve implies strict concavity of the revenue function in quantity.

econ.TH

Audit the Auditors: Commitment versus Professional Judgment

This paper provides a theoretical framework to evaluate the trade-off between the self-regulated peer review system and independent government inspection (PCAOB) in the auditing profession. We model the peer review system as a Judgment Regime, where a stakeholder utilizes professional expertise, captured as a private signal, to make ex-post decisions on verifying audit failures. In contrast, PCAOB inspection is modeled as a Commitment Regime, where the stakeholder lacks private information but can commit ex-ante to a predetermined level of verification. We find that the Judgment Regime benefits from a resource-allocation effect and a deterrence effect driven by informed verification, whereas the Commitment Regime deters audit failures through the first-mover advantage of ex-ante commitment. Our analysis demonstrates that the stakeholder prefers the peer review system if and only if the private signal is sufficiently informative. Furthermore, comparative statics reveal that higher verification costs or stronger audit incentives shift the stakeholder's preference toward PCAOB inspection.

econ.TH

Reputation, Disclosure, and the Scope of Entry

This paper studies how learning about an incumbent affects the scope of entry when competitive responses use resources shared across markets. An entrant chooses whether to launch in neither, one, or both of two markets. Entry into the second market reduces the incumbent's cost-reducing response in the first and can make one-market entry unattractive. The entrant learns about the incumbent's capability from a record of its response to an earlier rival. More frequent publication encourages a less capable incumbent to imitate a more capable one. An observed response then becomes less informative, and entry after that record expands. We compare publication of conduct with a public audit of capability. For an open set of parameters with uniform setup costs, full publication maximizes total surplus within the specified policy class when publication costs are low. Removing the interaction between response costs across markets reverses this choice, while preserving all early and singleton-market payoffs. A capability audit is dominated in both economies. Expected entry scope is constant across the considered policies within each technology, although productive investment and the allocation of entry change.

econ.TH