Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.14037

Affine Rank Minimization is ER Complete

Angshul Majumdar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study the decision problem Affine Rank Minimization, denoted ARM(k). The input consists of rational matrices A_1,...,A_q in Q^{m x n} and rational scalars b_1,...,b_q in Q. The question is whether there exists a real matrix X in R^{m x n} such that trace(A_l^T X) = b_l for all l in {1,...,q} and rank(X) <= k. We first prove membership: for every fixed k >= 1, ARM(k) lies in the existential theory of the reals by giving an explicit existential encoding of the rank constraint using a constant-size factorization witness. We then prove existential-theory-of-reals hardness via a polynomial-time many-one reduction from ETR to ARM(k), where the target instance uses only affine equalities together with a single global constraint rank(X) <= k. The reduction compiles an ETR formula into an arithmetic circuit in gate-equality normal form and assigns each circuit quantity to a designated entry of X. Affine semantics (constants, copies, addition, and negation) are enforced by linear constraints, while multiplicative semantics are enforced by constant-size rank-forcing gadgets. Soundness is certified by a fixed-rank gauge submatrix that removes factorization ambiguity. We prove a composition lemma showing that gadgets can be embedded without unintended interactions, yielding global soundness and completeness while preserving polynomial bounds on dimension and bit-length. Consequently, ARM(k) is complete for the existential theory of the reals; in particular, ARM(3) is complete. This shows that feasibility of purely affine constraints under a fixed constant rank bound captures the full expressive power of real algebraic feasibility.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Angshul Majumdar. 2026-02-15. Affine Rank Minimization is ER Complete. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC↗