Metrology of Complexity and Implications for the Study of the Emergence of Life

Sara Imari Walker

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.18203

Metrology of Complexity and Implications for the Study of the Emergence of Life

Sara Imari Walker

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

One of the longest standing open problems in science is how life arises from non-living matter. If it is possible to measure this transition in the lab, then it might be possible to understand the physical mechanisms by which the emergence of life occurs, which so far have evaded scientific understanding. A significant hurdle is the lack of standards or a framework for cross comparison across different experimental contexts and planetary environments. In this essay, I review current challenges in experimental approaches to origin of life chemistry, focusing on those associated with quantifying experimental selectivity versus de novo generation of molecular complexity, and I highlight new methods using molecular assembly theory to measure molecular complexity. This metrology-centered approach can enable rigorous testing of hypotheses about the cascade of major transitions in molecular order marking the emergence of life, while potentially bridging traditional divides between metabolism-first and genetics-first scenarios. Grounding the study of life's origins in measurable complexity has significant implications for the search for life beyond Earth, suggesting paths toward theory-driven detection of biological complexity in diverse planetary contexts. As the field moves forward, standardized measurements of molecular complexity may help unify currently disparate approaches to understanding how matter transforms to life. Much remains to be done in this exciting frontier.

Explore related subjects

q-bio.BM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Sara Imari Walker. 2026-02-20. Metrology of Complexity and Implications for the Study of the Emergence of Life. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18203

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

In Vivo Length Distributions as Mechanistic Fingerprints of Pathological Protein Aggregation

Modern imaging techniques can resolve individual pathological protein aggregates in postmortem human samples, providing detailed measurements of aggregate size distributions that are inaccessible with conventional bulk approaches. These distributions represent mechanistic fingerprints of the microscopic processes that generated the observed pathology, but extracting this mechanistic information requires a quantitative theoretical framework. Here, we develop the mathematical tools needed to interpret aggregate length distributions in living systems, where aggregate growth competes with active removal. We show that, across a class of models, the length distribution of sufficiently large aggregates approaches a geometric decay. Crucially, the decay rate is determined by the balance between aggregate elongation and removal, providing a direct quantitative readout of these competing processes from a single time point measurement. This enables mechanistic comparisons between healthy and diseased human samples without requiring longitudinal measurements of aggregate dynamics. We further analyse how additional aggregation and removal processes modify the observed length distributions. Together, these results establish the mathematical foundations and tools to use aggregate length distributions as an experimentally accessible route for inferring microscopic aggregation dynamics directly from human tissue.

q-bio.BM↗

arXiv2026

Decoding enzyme-substrate interaction topology reveals principles underlying catalytic efficiency and mutational outcomes

The enzyme turnover number (kcat) defines catalytic efficiency and constrains quantitative models of metabolism, yet the molecular determinants governing kcat and its response to mutation remain poorly understood. Measurements are sparse and labor-intensive, and most computational approaches provide numerical predictions without explaining how enzyme-substrate interactions shape catalytic outcomes. A central challenge is therefore to identify the topological principles that determine where mutations act and how their functional outcomes are encoded within the enzyme-substrate interaction network. Here, we show that catalytic efficiency and mutational effects can be interpreted through enzyme-substrate interaction topology. We developed Interkcat, an interpretable bidirectional cross-attention framework that captures reciprocal coordination between protein residues and substrate atoms. Optimized on a unified benchmark, Interkcat achieves state-of-the-art predictive performance (R2 = 0.701). From its learned representations, we derive an Interaction Topology Score (ITS) that identifies sequence regions statistically enriched for mutation-sensitive sites without explicit structural inputs. We further demonstrate that higher-order topological features distinguish opposing mutational outcomes: lethal mutations disrupt coordinated networks, whereas activity-preserving or enhancing mutations retain sparse, globally organized coupling. These findings establish interaction topology as a unifying principle linking enzyme sequence, catalytic efficiency, and evolutionary perturbation.

q-bio.BM↗

arXiv2026

Adapting Boltz-2 with limited experimental activity data improves early enrichment in virtual screening

Virtual screening aims to prioritize active compounds from large chemical libraries within a limited experimental budget. When applying Boltz-2 to virtual screening, a key challenge is how to use limited experimental data from the target assay to improve the prioritization of active compounds. We investigated whether fine-tuning the Boltz-2 affinity heads with a small number of binary activity labels could improve early enrichment of active compounds in hit discovery. We compared fine-tuning with 40-300 labels in a retrospective evaluation on eight MF-PCBA targets. With 300 activity measurements, fine-tuning increased the number of actives in the top 1% by a geometric mean of 1.77-fold across the eight targets and improved average precision (AP) by 2.14-fold relative to the control without fine-tuning. We also investigated whether rescoring a subset of candidates could retain the improvement in hit recovery by reranking only the top-ranked Boltz-2 candidates with the fine-tuned head. Restricting rescoring to approximately 10% of the evaluation set retained hit recovery comparable to full rescoring. These findings show that affinity-head fine-tuning with limited activity labels improves early enrichment with Boltz-2 and that this benefit can be retained when rescoring a restricted set of candidates.

q-bio.BM↗