Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2602.19407

Multi-CoLoR: Context-Aware Localization and Reasoning across Multi-Language Codebases

Abstract

Large language models demonstrate strong capabilities in code generation but struggle to navigate complex, multi-language repositories to locate relevant code. Effective code localization requires understanding both organizational context (e.g., historical issue-fix patterns) and structural relationships within heterogeneous codebases. Existing methods either (i) focus narrowly on single-language benchmarks, (ii) retrieve code across languages via shallow textual similarity, or (iii) assume no prior context. We present Multi-CoLoR, a framework for Context-aware Localization and Reasoning across Multi-Language codebases, which integrates organizational knowledge retrieval with graph-based reasoning to traverse complex software ecosystems. Multi-CoLoR operates in two stages: (i) a similar issue context (SIC) module retrieves semantically and organizationally related historical issues to prune the search space, and (ii) a code graph traversal agent (an extended version of LocAgent, a state-of-the-art localization framework) performs structural reasoning within C++ and QML codebases. Evaluations on a real-world enterprise dataset show that incorporating SIC reduces the search space and improves localization accuracy, and graph-based reasoning generalizes effectively beyond Python-only repositories. Combined, Multi-CoLoR improves Acc@5 over both lexical and graph-based baselines while reducing tool calls on an AMD codebase.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Indira Vats, Sanjukta De, Subhayan Roy, Saurabh Bodhe, Lejin Varghese, Max Kiehn, Yonas Bedasso, Marsha Chechik. 2026-02-23. Multi-CoLoR: Context-Aware Localization and Reasoning across Multi-Language Codebases. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Combining Type Inference and Automated Unit Test Generation for Python

Automated unit test generation is an established research field that has so far focused on statically-typed programming languages. The lack of type information in dynamically-typed programming languages, such as Python, inhibits test generators, which heavily rely on information about parameter and return types of functions to select suitable arguments when constructing test cases. Since automated test generators inherently rely on frequent execution of candidate tests, we make use of these frequent executions to address this problem by introducing type tracing, which extracts type-related information during execution and gradually refines the available type information. We implement type tracing as an extension of the Pynguin test-generation framework for Python, allowing it (i) to infer parameter types by observing how parameters are used during runtime, (ii) to record the types of values that function calls return, and (iii) to use this type information to increase code coverage. The approach leads to up to 87.8 % more branch coverage, improved mutation scores, and to type information of similar quality to that produced by other state-of-the-art type-inference tools.

cs.SE

MigrateLib: a tool for end-to-end Python library migration

Library migration is the process of replacing a library with a similar one in a software project. Manual library migration is time consuming and error prone, as it requires developers to understand the Application Programming Interfaces (API) of both libraries, map equivalent APIs, and perform the necessary code transformations. Due to the difficulty of the library migration process, most of the existing automated techniques and tooling stop at the API mapping stage or support a limited set of libraries and code transformations. In this paper, we develop an end-to-end solution that can automatically migrate code between any arbitrary pair of Python libraries that provide similar functionality. Due to the promising capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in code generation and transformation, we use LLMs as the primary engine for migration. Before building the tool, we first study the capabilities of LLMs for library migration on a benchmark of 321 real-world library migrations. We find that LLMs can effectively perform library migration, but some post-processing steps can further improve the performance. Based on this, we develop MigrateLib, a command line application that combines the power of LLMs, static analysis, and dynamic analysis to provide accurate library migration. We evaluate MigrateLib on 717 real-world Python applications that are not from our benchmark. We find that MigrateLib can migrate 32% of the migrations with complete correctness. Of the remaining migrations, only 14% of the migration-related changes are left for developers to fix for more than half of the projects.

cs.SE

Constraint Decay: The Fragility of LLM Agents in Backend Code Generation

Large Language Model (LLM) agents demonstrate strong performance in autonomous code generation under loose specifications. However, production-grade software requires strict adherence to structural constraints, such as architectural patterns, databases, and object-relational mappings. Existing benchmarks often overlook these non-functional requirements, rewarding functionally correct but structurally arbitrary solutions. We present a systematic study evaluating how well agents handle structural constraints in multi-file backend generation. By fixing a unified API contract across 80 greenfield generation tasks and 20 feature-implementation tasks spanning eight web frameworks, we isolate the effect of structural complexity using a dual evaluation with end-to-end behavioral tests and static verifiers. Our findings reveal a phenomenon of constraint decay: as structural requirements accumulate, agent performance exhibits a substantial decline. Evaluated configurations lose 27.28 points on average in assertion pass rates from baseline to fully specified tasks. Framework sensitivity analysis exposes performance disparities: mid-tier models succeed in minimal, explicit frameworks (e.g., Flask) but perform substantially worse on average in convention-heavy environments (e.g., FastAPI, Django). Finally, error analysis identifies data-layer defects (e.g., incorrect query composition and ORM runtime violations) as the leading root causes. This work highlights that jointly satisfying functional and structural requirements remains a key open challenge for coding agents.

cs.SE