Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2602.19934

Parallelism and Adaptivity in Student-Teacher Witnessing

Ondřej Ježil·Dimitrios Tsintsilidas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Student-Teacher Games are a model of computation in which a computationally restricted Student attempts to produce a string satisfying a refutable property, while an all-powerful Teacher refutes incorrect candidates by providing counterexamples. By the classical result of Krajíček, Pudlák, and Takeuti [KPT90], such games capture the witnessing of $\forall\exists\forall$-formulas in bounded arithmetic. In this paper, we introduce subclasses of total search problems in the polynomial hierarchy, classified by the number of rounds and candidate answers per round required for a Student at the corresponding level to solve them. Assuming the polynomial hierarchy does not collapse, we separate these classes for different number of rounds and queries. As applications we obtain the following results: (a) We study theories of bounded arithmetic axiomatized by fine-grained variants of length induction and bounded collection. We prove a general witnessing theorem connecting their $\forall\exists\forall$-consequences to the appropriate classes of Student-Teacher Games. Under the non-collapse of the polynomial hierarchy, we separate these theories. (b) These conditional separations resolve two open problems in bounded arithmetic: one by Buss and Ressayre [Bus85, CK93] on the strength of bounded collection, and one by Pollett [Pol97] on the difference between strict and non-strict double length induction. (c) Finally, we extend the unprovability of circuit upper bounds due to Krajíček and Oliveira [KO17] to the theory $PV_1+BB(Σ^b_1)$, and the unprovability of strong co-nondeterministic circuit lower bounds due to Pich and Santhanam [PS21] to the theory $PV_1+LLIND(sΣ^b_1)$. By the preceding separations, both theories strictly extend $PV_1$ assuming $NP\nsubseteq P/poly$.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCcs.LOmath.LO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ondřej Ježil, Dimitrios Tsintsilidas. 2026-02-23. Parallelism and Adaptivity in Student-Teacher Witnessing. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19934

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC↗