Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2603.01615

Closing the Gap Between Float and Posit Hardware Efficiency

Abstract

The b-posit, or bounded posit, is a variation of the posit format designed for high performance computing (HPC) and AI applications. Unlike traditional floating-point formats (floats), posits use variable-length fields for exponent scaling and significand, providing better efficiency for the same bit width. However, this flexibility introduces high worst-case overhead in decode-encode logic, exceeding the cost of handling subnormals for floats. To address this, the b-posit restricts the regime field to a 6-bit limit, reducing variability in regime and fraction sizes. With an exponent size eS of 5 bits, the dynamic range is $2^{-192}$ to $2^{192}$ (about $10^{-58}$ to $10^{58}$) and the quire size is 800 bits, for any precision $n>12$. This constraint improves numerical properties and simplifies hardware implementation by allowing decode-encode operations with basic multiplexers. Our 32-bit b-posit decoder circuits achieve significant improvements: 79 percent less power consumption, 71 percent smaller area, and 60 percent reduced latency compared to standard posit decoders. The 32-bit b-posit encoder shows 68 percent lower power usage, 46 percent less area, and 44 percent shorter delay. The proposed b-posit hardware exhibits superior scalability with increasing bit widths, outperforming standard posit hardware at higher precisions, with even greater advantages at 64-bit. Notably, the b-posit decode-encode hardware matches or exceeds IEEE compliant 32-bit floating-point performance, offering faster and smaller area implementation, with slight increase in worst-case power due to higher speed. The b-posit hardware design provides the clean mathematical behavior and higher accuracy of posits versus IEEE floats without the power, area, or latency costs observed for the Posit Standard (2022). We believe the b-posit should influence future standard revisions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aditya Anirudh Jonnalagadda, Rishi Thotli, John L. Gustafson. 2026-03-02. Closing the Gap Between Float and Posit Hardware Efficiency. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01615

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bi-SamplerZ: A Rejection-Aware Cooperative Gaussian Sampling Framework for Falcon Signature Hardware

We present Bi-SamplerZ, a rejection-aware cooperative sampling framework that converts this idle capacity into useful computation. After an asymmetric accept/reject outcome, Bi- SamplerZ latches the completed logical result and dynamically reassigns the released physical datapath to the unfinished target. The two paths then evaluate fresh independent candidates for the same remaining distribution. We show that this post-rejection cooperation increases the assisted-round completion probability without modifying the underlying candidate distribution or Bernoulli acceptance rule, and we state the randomness-allocation conditions required to preserve the joint output distribution of the original pair of logical sampler calls

cs.AR

A Multi-Engine Dataflow for MoE Decoding on Scratchpad-Based Tensor Accelerators

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) decoding on scratchpad-based tensor accelerators (STA) is dominated by moving expert weights while the compute engines sit idle. This traffic is hard to hide, because the experts are known only after routing, and hard to shrink without losing quality or adding critical-path work. We present CARDAN, which represents each expert-weight matrix as a vector-quantized component plus a shared-basis low-rank component and co-designs this representation with a multi-engine decoding dataflow. The representation separates expert-common from expert-private work, so the dataflow overlaps DMA with computation on several engines. Across five MoE families on AWS Trainium3, CARDAN matches or improves BF16-teacher perplexity across all five models and speeds up batch-one decoding by 1.15-1.31x over AWS dense MoE megakernels, rising to 1.7x at batch size 16.

cs.AR

Dissecting How Die Scaling Breaks GPU Fine-grained Scheduling

Modern GPUs are no longer physically symmetric. Die scaling leads to both manufacturing-driven floorsweeping and cache and memory partitioning. The former creates chip-specific compute topologies, while the latter causes non-uniform memory access. These asymmetries are substantial. Topology-oblivious compute unit allocation can lead to up to 1.33x performance variation, while remote accesses increase HBM latency by up to 67% and nearly double L2 latency. However, these asymmetries are hidden behind the GPU's logical resource abstractions and can vary across chips. We develop lightweight characterization methods to uncover per-chip compute topology and memory affinity. We then use the discovered information to make existing fine-grained scheduling asymmetry-aware, considering not only how many resources are allocated but also which physical resources are assigned. Across full-GPU kernel execution, intra-application multiplexing, and inter-application co-location, asymmetry-aware scheduling improves mainstream kernels by up to 1.22x, multiplexed LLM inference by up to 14.3%, and avoids up to 1.33x performance variation.

cs.AR